From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 18:30:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0836916A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:30:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D5443D4C for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:30:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j24IUMwk060264 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:30:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j24IUMqY060261; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:30:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:30:22 GMT Message-Id: <200503041830.j24IUMqY060261@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Simon Barner Subject: Re: ports/78361: devel/libast not 5.x compatible, thus breaking other ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Simon Barner List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:30:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/78361; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Simon Barner To: Frank Altpeter Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/78361: devel/libast not 5.x compatible, thus breaking other ports Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:23:16 +0100 > Since the update to 0.6.2 of the devel/libast port, it requires > a define LIBAST_COMPAT_05_API to have 0.5 compatibility. If this > is not set on configure time, several functions like > libast_malloc() are not defined anymore. > There are ports like x11/eterm that require this function and > thus are not buildable anymore. Hi, this seems to be a dupe of (or at least related to) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=77906 The eterm problem has been fixed with the update to 0.9.3. Do you know any other consumers of libast which were broken by the update? Simon