From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 19:15:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD2C16A4CE; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:15:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E0743D2D; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:15:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7RJFbfm088376; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:15:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i7RJFbXv088375; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:15:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:15:37 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Oliver Lehmann Message-ID: <20040827191537.GA88281@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200408271752.i7RHq6KO067448@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040827204247.5aea0ce6.oliver@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040827204247.5aea0ce6.oliver@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/gettext Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:15:38 -0000 On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:42:47PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > I would realy like to see this as a global option in bsd.port.mk. Me too! :-) > I have an system-wide definition of WITH(OUT)_* variables dependant on the > portname. The OPTIONS-way interferes that. I would like to see that it's > not a must-do to use that dialog menu (and only that...) > Maybe it would be possible to implement an WITHOUT_OPTIONS .if-case which > would print the things out defined in OPTIONS instead of dialog-ing them? > Please find an example patch implementing this attached. Perfect! Except could you also look at supporting WITH(OUT)_${PORTNAME}_OPTIONS also? I think it wouldn't be too much work to extend it to this also. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)