Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 05:50:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com> To: moore@WOLFE.net (Timothy Moore) Cc: obrien@leonardo.net, bakul@netcom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: This one looks very very suspecious to me.... Message-ID: <199505101050.FAA05512@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <199505100331.UAA08835@gonzo.wolfe.net> from "Timothy Moore" at May 9, 95 08:31:51 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Like it or not, it's legal ANSI C behavior for the preprocessor to > tokenize its input. If you want a macro preprocesor, use m4 =:O > (ducks) What the hell is wrong with m4? Why do people keep encouraging the use of CPP for general macro processing when m4 is so much better?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505101050.FAA05512>