Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:09:13 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> Subject: Re: tap(4) and host-only networking between host and guest Message-ID: <563C6029.5010109@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <CAG=rPVcj7Uh0WG=o2gHRPcfAc3bbH59WLCXXURWm4Y-x4HXn8w@mail.gmail.com> References: <20151104075454.GA99850@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <5639FF12.1020109@freebsd.org> <20151104131230.GA1117@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20151104184503.GC1117@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <563B8C9A.7070104@grosbein.net> <563BF60B.5090201@quip.cz> <CAG=rPVcj7Uh0WG=o2gHRPcfAc3bbH59WLCXXURWm4Y-x4HXn8w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06.11.2015 07:59, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > >> Eugene Grosbein wrote on 11/05/2015 18:06: >> >>> Yes, it is. And there is a solution: >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165174 >>> >> >> I don't understand why such useful patches are left uncommited and without >> any comments in PR for years. >> >> > This is not official project policy, but in future, I recommend that for > submitting patches to the > project, people try to use the steps at: https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview > to submit the patch to Phabricator. > > As a FreeBSD developer, I personally find that Phabricator is easier to > work with patches thatn Bugzilla. > > Other FreeBSD developers may disagree with me, but more FreeBSD developers > are starting to use Phabricator. I've just read https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview and registered at Phabricator. It seems more developer-centric (it needs commit-messages etc.) and over-complicated for non-developer reporting small bug and supplying small fix.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?563C6029.5010109>