Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 22:50:05 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, Jake Burkholder <jake@checker.org> Subject: Re: rfork patch, please comment Message-ID: <199910290450.WAA02527@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910282139280.11610-100000@current1.whistle.com> References: <XFMail.991029105857.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910282139280.11610-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Actually the kernel side of it would be quite quick.. > there is a user side component that multiplexes the user threads onto the > kernel threads but it's actually pretty straight forward. > > We may try give a bit of a talk about it a t teh next Bay Area freeBS > User's Group meeting.. As well as dicuss the other possibilities. > That'll give us a reason to get our act together. :-) Except that 99% of the FreeBSD developers don't got the the User's group meeting in the Bay Area. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910290450.WAA02527>