From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Dec 13 19:25:31 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA03406 for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 19:25:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (root@spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id TAA03398; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 19:25:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (peter@localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id LAA14176; Sat, 14 Dec 1996 11:25:09 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: <199612140325.LAA14176@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: Bill Fenner cc: Mike Pritchard , freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: pending/2089 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Dec 1996 18:07:54 PST." <96Dec13.180804pst.177711@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 11:25:09 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Bill Fenner wrote: > In message <199612122207.OAA10569@freefall.freebsd.org> you write: > >Moved from pending to correct area. > > You should make them non-confidential, too, so that they show up on > the open bug lists and the web page queries. I sent email to all of > the originators of these bugs asking if it was OK for me to make them > non-confidential but nobody replied so I didn't do anything. > > Bill I think we should change the default send-pr so that either: 1: it removes confidential submission support altogether and suggests that if it's security related they should mail security-officer, or 2: yells loudly at the user and makes sure that they understand that marking something confidential prevents the bug-fixers from seeing it and practically ensures that it will be ignored. Cheers, -Peter