Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 02:00:40 -0800 From: Dragos Ruiu <dr@kyx.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, Konrad Heuer <kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TCPDUMP patch v1.1 and AppleTalk Message-ID: <0011080203080F.00551@smp.kyx.net> In-Reply-To: <20001107223959.B41350@citusc17.usc.edu> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011071347410.1003-100000@gwdu60.gwdg.de> <20001107223959.B41350@citusc17.usc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 07 Nov 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 01:56:21PM +0100, Konrad Heuer wrote: > > > After patching and installing, tcpdump can't be used anymore since it puts > > very heavy load onto the network via xl0 and AppleTalk broadcast messages > > (one message each 0.2 ms). Sorry, in the moment I don't know more details > > ... > > tcpdump shouldn't be sending any appletalk packets, I thought (I may > be wrong, never used it on an appletalk network). Are you sure this is > the problem? I've never run this kind of a scenario here so I'm speaking from a vacuum of knowledge and pure conjecture... ;-) but could it be generating packets through name resolutions.... ??? Does it still generate the packets with -n ? cheers, --dr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0011080203080F.00551>