From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 6 04:23:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A408106568B for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D4C8FC0A for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n964NZvo006352; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:23:35 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n964NZ0K006351; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:23:35 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:23:35 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20091006042335.GB5857@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <20091005120418.GA63131@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <4AC9E29B.6080908@mail.ru> <20091005123230.GA64167@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <4AC9EFDF.4080302@mail.ru> <20091005140409.GB89194@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <4ACA02F7.6040409@mail.ru> <20091005145037.GA92519@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <4ACA0BA6.70706@mail.ru> <20091005154236.GA95635@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <4ACA31B9.5090406@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ACA31B9.5090406@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: rihad , Luigi Rizzo , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dummynet dropping too many packets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:23:43 -0000 On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:49:45AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > >There is a rumour about FreeBSD's shedulers... > >That they are not so good for 8 cores and that you may get MORE speed > >by disabling 4 cores if it's possible for your system. > >Or even using uniprocessor kernel. > >Only rumour, though :-) > true for 6.x, less true for 7.x, and not true for 8.x That's great. For both of ULE and BSD? Eugene