From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 10 08:11:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99AC3B1B for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 08:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps.markoturk.info (vps.markoturk.info [95.154.208.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C3E1EEB for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 08:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vps.markoturk.info (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9F22E273A2; Sun, 10 May 2015 10:01:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 10:01:30 +0200 From: Marko Turk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Postfix vulnarebility wrongly reported by pkg audit? Message-ID: <20150510080130.GC2534@vps.markoturk.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 08:11:40 -0000 --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, today my postfix-2.11.4,1 was marked as vulnerable by the pkg audit tool. But, when I go to the web pages the tool outputs it says that my version of postfix is not vulnerable (and that this vulnerabilities are =66rom 2011). Is my version also vulnerable or is there an issue with version check? BR, Marko --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVTxBaAAoJEDcRe7P/w1sjb4wQAOIsf3cb22q9iHPSnRvgkyWd N9b/W7HsYTQ5KEnOyVGT2EItpaaUT41sNZitIunG/uPB/fUqWg8hUiKvhlDVwKfz Xd9n0oczLSsjcDgmG0AGRsNjaoGLpQX64dhn1jPG/iJcH2CfBqZ+tUtPrwoUYhgR 6dnio8b04rFUSYZTxJylY9rjNhrYz6ZYRzobOJs25oH89OA61xWw4+WLy5LEpqMT ENjWlVhmf1hCbCotp03HNT5Ckaxuduz21j5Lmu+bPxZhsTbB+O4jjbUNPpWfRrHz 8pwaQTd+atO/v1PLZ765JKv9aktYgTk8eWxTvUOFrqJaTZuGflo6P0lYFD0dqV1X m8V9nTKBSYCUZkdeXVVeQl/HpnD6Hk5XET6dec1L/WjsVnFM8IopBm7EXW1PMtRR Wn1bs44OxU5PZE1T4jBCxQOt7TOq30sriPVnce0Fgk9gyrOcIKjMNUe2SftAxaIH 6Rcrcv6H9hgZXARUBkaoEFL4T9Pa2kFVgOTFbGMkvJTjbmVH9APT8I1E4N7ugfoq TJwuZVRr+RbzStJLQH3AHLKrTPKx0xFtTgDaoS7Xa7S9f2hnZ/0reGHD9u/qs6CD bF5NX7h72VZwkWhkyZXchiF5c4N2jfm+rdd3s35HPQpw5sBFZsLO22/WRpsfzwvx Vx9gANvwbVrHo2i+S0Rw =+Ey7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 10 09:07:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC9928C1 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 09:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rand.keepquiet.net (keepquiet.net [144.76.43.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "keepquiet.net", Issuer "PositiveSSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79F101436 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 09:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.130.10.108] (cm-84.210.76.250.getinternet.no [84.210.76.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: terje@elde.net) by rand.keepquiet.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05D6ACBE; Sun, 10 May 2015 09:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Postfix vulnarebility wrongly reported by pkg audit? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_873ACB18-7AEB-4ECC-B22F-B1940506CCC6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 From: Terje Elde In-Reply-To: <20150510080130.GC2534@vps.markoturk.info> Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 11:06:54 +0200 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <58DE831C-17C4-425A-8761-623137AE302F@elde.net> References: <20150510080130.GC2534@vps.markoturk.info> To: Marko Turk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 09:07:04 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_873ACB18-7AEB-4ECC-B22F-B1940506CCC6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On 10 May 2015, at 10:01, Marko Turk wrote: >=20 > today my postfix-2.11.4,1 was marked as vulnerable by the pkg audit > tool. But, when I go to the web pages the tool outputs it says that my > version of postfix is not vulnerable (and that this vulnerabilities = are > from 2011). >=20 > Is my version also vulnerable or is there an issue with version check? I looked into this yesterday myself, and I=E2=80=99m pretty sure this is = just an issue with the version check. There was a commit yesterday which changed wildcards to zeroes for = several ports, including postfix: = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml?r1=3D385815&= r2=3D385864 The reason was that wildcards are not valid version-numbers, yet they do = indeed seem valid for VuXML-version matching: = https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/security-notify.html= My guess is that this leads to the versjon-check logic throwing up your = version of postfix as a false positive. I fired off an email to the committer of the change, but no word yet. = Just been a few hours though. Terje --Apple-Mail=_873ACB18-7AEB-4ECC-B22F-B1940506CCC6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Public key and proof available here: https://keybase.io/tld iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVTx+uAAoJEFS925qcwrKG1qMH/1JYb3GYXu7tZKNYWywWQ6IJ lF9wEWFu4PUksOZBOi45gmck/PpQpFq9uLuKgcanE2j09018PafQmGsjDiS7gI9l OiOHkID90wvSkDg3BHt0dzB8f7GBJGAPVLx1GYVu0IHGU06yrOjfWMbALPqM2RlB Wg0TgRYAcmWuyLRX1eazYFgOnyPMnuQmDMqQn2Xu0DFDFh/C8eAEbAbxxyitHWik QpWitXyadTINqJK0lB7S6ZKixgf7Dm1iQ0BhFu5+iYoM8XBLSN15hteP58P/1g+L 8UYwRp8IghwAsOX6+RFe2Z9VX0q+Chh9AXN50tq2ku05esTVxDd1cH4XnkcSzbM= =mLiP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_873ACB18-7AEB-4ECC-B22F-B1940506CCC6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 10 09:08:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DBA9955 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 09:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1629A1444 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 09:08:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 80) id 7FA52B340956; Sun, 10 May 2015 02:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [2001:470:67:119::4]) by mail.parts-unknown.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2015 02:08:19 -0700 Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 02:08:19 -0700 Message-ID: <20150510020819.Horde.eC28WWwjJ0tJo9WbqQ-sno0@mail.parts-unknown.org> From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postfix vulnarebility wrongly reported by pkg audit? In-Reply-To: <20150510080130.GC2534@vps.markoturk.info> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_7lquv8cp-bqlJsnmoM7iZmT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 09:08:27 -0000 This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_7lquv8cp-bqlJsnmoM7iZmT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoting Marko Turk : > > today my postfix-2.11.4,1 was marked as vulnerable by the pkg audit > tool. But, when I go to the web pages the tool outputs it says that my > version of postfix is not vulnerable (and that this vulnerabilities are > from 2011). If I understood correctly, the problem is with the ownership of=20=20 /var/db/postfix.=20But to be honest, I don't see how it's in fact a=20=20 vulnerability.=20The complaint is that the ownership is set to root=20=20 rather=20than postfix. When I look at my instance, I see: [benfell@home ~]% ls -ald /var/db/postfix drwx------ 2 postfix wheel 512 Apr 16 01:07 /var/db/postfix Now, I can see how root ownership might prevent postfix from working.=20=20 Not=20how it's a vulnerability. And it seems that at least on my=20=20 instance,=20it is correctly set, anyhow. So I'm just confused. --=20 David=20Benfell --=_7lquv8cp-bqlJsnmoM7iZmT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: PGP Digital Signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJVTyADAAoJEBV64x4SNmArdc0QAIWA0TWKb+HNinWilqB1zK8E cCFLsNJljL5tQKYxNtlhlKTfy+vaVaCwsuLxIwGkTV7kPsSH8TCSNcMV2iZvpHe7 dQpt6G7J3kc0OqVR25HW9dnrlcmvZi7WvN9xzmc5zRbF6OxGGNRu4q8nOLhib7ui 7+6H5TOI/lngum0JbyamU/1GKGlMNNmizIK8rJMmpfq2lN8Z5ctpnJRb0OY9F2c3 nR32f77YZlnviKxO9e5rYpE3bLXgYP51qiKWuKtBYo1HYaxkrGiQhbAqJd8qA590 EODvsy66v8AYDobACpY1eFQK0t3F+HhNt/WhyBgsU2IOoqedAJb7b5O4JvTNXmBg Ou8nCHgsWnG/CcKrFR5lbPcJap0gRWrXyfXl2m+QGRKYUrL1plQUHiaDcAyMwTBo Eq2SCAga+Zq0OTwnlZa2M9lc2lLp12Up9BnyfxmobbbrOwRnIcOu4iZiZSdaaeeR tcYBWW/6nGxw7kuyE/QT8rOVKcNCx8K9JJ65FN7qaN+NZAYn4pKGvSinKSc/nYVZ ConUxF2OSgXfxDEIlpVZzsF4KOf+p6EGZaD6xs0Z0+Vn2bNrxTi1p01CHtOizWGS fzg6dBCOS3QnqFJACmQr5XhqwNVgUNEfSty5SO6CSncd+dPNDRhP0lffSbPzPW7s JsO18XKrIOUQGP4o9n7m =OBfD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_7lquv8cp-bqlJsnmoM7iZmT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 10 19:03:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34471229 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 19:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "3s1.com", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E82BD1E7A for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 19:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4AJ3pVY010822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 15:03:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1431716630.bb1941@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id t4AJ3os2010810 for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 15:03:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1431716630.bb1941@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1431716630.bb1941@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Sun, 10 May 2015 15:03:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 15:03:44 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: permissions and ownership of /usr/src Message-ID: <20150510190342.GA9986@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: David Banning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 19:03:59 -0000 I am in the process of upgrading my system from 8.2 to 9.3. I deleted the /usr/src folder and re-created it. Presently the permissions are; drwxr-xr-x 22 root wheel 1024 May 9 17:32 src but I am getting an access error to /usr/src from mergemaster. Can anyone tell me what the permissions - ownership are/should be for /usr/src ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 10 19:44:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1F1A87B for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 19:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT004-OMC4S41.hotmail.com (snt004-omc4s41.hotmail.com [65.54.51.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B977123E for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 19:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT146-W64 ([65.55.90.201]) by SNT004-OMC4S41.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Sun, 10 May 2015 12:43:17 -0700 X-TMN: [whMhhrSxa9uasvHD4DRjnTJKVLN6CLLP] X-Originating-Email: [ricky1252@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Ricky G CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: permissions and ownership of /usr/src Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 15:43:17 -0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20150510190342.GA9986@skytracker.ca> References: <20150510190342.GA9986@skytracker.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2015 19:43:17.0251 (UTC) FILETIME=[8FAC0530:01D08B59] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 19:44:24 -0000 I ran into this once and it was because exec=3Doff on the zfs dataset755 is= my current permissions as well. > Date: Sun=2C 10 May 2015 15:03:44 -0400 > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: permissions and ownership of /usr/src > From: david+dated+1431716630.bb1941@skytracker.ca >=20 > I am in the process of upgrading my system from 8.2 to 9.3. >=20 > I deleted the /usr/src folder and re-created it. Presently the permission= s > are=3B >=20 > drwxr-xr-x 22 root wheel 1024 May 9 17:32 src >=20 > but I am getting an access error to /usr/src from mergemaster. >=20 > Can anyone tell me what the permissions - ownership are/should be for /us= r/src ? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 10 21:06:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFBF6ECE for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 21:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97541C35 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 21:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so55587760igb.1 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 14:06:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fjLJSPCLftHMvGf1wJTjwqY8+1tJ9C7rh/2+wiyXhT0=; b=sN/Jl0D525zKzkAd2MC7vzIxZxG9AIP4/LGIYzjQ6yxQ2QOKxXPUep3LixXyJiqRao eyFhJtYwyMV/3u79OJby5M17NApWMXuosB6yj68HMr4qEJb5So9E5WHfbPNYNzeRzam2 /Cj++qRywIbwuy4pPLqgjJmazrxgkei9qAG4gTzJ2GXrAXO8xmR7cQgCe7wEKK+n0nzJ 4kssBJnt/3EkCYGUy2/OwXrohpJ90+iW35O25W4LyNn3RMwZQAnZdC/NMCr1UvSQVmaD IVWoeEIKvSdZsfW4E5yJiB7MaPqDehiuQ/ojgO5eEXtm3qDu/kqi17OJ63c9UqOURRI7 c80Q== X-Received: by 10.43.39.208 with SMTP id tn16mr7732143icb.27.1431291998177; Sun, 10 May 2015 14:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.5] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h128sm8408006ioh.38.2015.05.10.14.06.37 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 May 2015 14:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <554FC878.7070401@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 17:07:04 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Certificate error Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 21:06:39 -0000 Hello list; Been trying to setup qpopper to use TLS. I am stuck at getting a self signed certificate to work. Running fetchmail on the host to get a good log of what is really happening as shown below. After that list is the script I use to build the certificates. Maybe some one can seen what I am doing wrong in the build cert script based on the errors shown in the fetchmail list.. Thanks Script started on Sun May 10 16:30:25 2015 /root >fetchmail -vv fetchmail: WARNING: Running as root is discouraged. Old UID list from pop.powerman.com: Scratch list of UIDs: fetchmail: 6.3.26 querying pop.powerman.com (protocol POP3) at Sun May 10 16:30:37 2015: poll started Trying to connect to 10.0.10.2/110...connected. fetchmail: POP3< +OK ready <1301.1431289837@localhost> fetchmail: POP3> CAPA fetchmail: POP3< +OK Capability list follows fetchmail: POP3< TOP fetchmail: POP3< USER fetchmail: POP3< LOGIN-DELAY 0 fetchmail: POP3< EXPIRE NEVER fetchmail: POP3< UIDL fetchmail: POP3< RESP-CODES fetchmail: POP3< AUTH-RESP-CODE fetchmail: POP3< X-MANGLE fetchmail: POP3< X-MACRO fetchmail: POP3< X-LOCALTIME Sun, 10 May 2015 16:30:37 -0400 fetchmail: POP3< STLS fetchmail: POP3< . fetchmail: POP3> STLS fetchmail: POP3< +OK STLS fetchmail: Server certificate: fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Powerman fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: pop.powerman.com fetchmail: Subject CommonName: pop.powerman.com fetchmail: pop.a1poweruser.com key fingerprint: 51:EC:3E:14:EA:E0:A9:97:1F:9F:D9:30:35:72:44:EA fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: self signed certificate fetchmail: Missing trust anchor certificate: cat qpopper.build.cert #! /bin/sh # Lets get to the correct location cd /usr/local/etc/qpopper # Lets delete existing stuff to re-create clean rm -v CA.key CA.crt pop3.key.pem pop3.cert.csr pop3.cert.pem echo "Creating a private CA key" openssl genrsa -des3 -out CA.key 2048 echo "Creating a private CA certificate" openssl req -new -x509 -days 3650 -key CA.key -out CA.crt echo "Creating a private ssl/tls pop3 key" openssl genrsa -out pop3.key.pem 2048 echo "Creating a private certificate signing request" openssl req -new -key pop3.key.pem -out pop3.cert.csr echo "Sign certificate using own CAsigning request" openssl x509 -req -in pop3.cert.csr -out pop3.cert.pem -sha1 -CA CA.crt -CAkey CA.key -CAcreateserial -days 3650 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 10 21:54:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39CBAA19 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 21:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F125D10CF for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 21:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-97-206.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.97.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712FC3CCDD; Sun, 10 May 2015 23:45:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t4ALjV79002766; Sun, 10 May 2015 23:45:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 23:45:31 +0200 From: Polytropon To: David Banning Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: permissions and ownership of /usr/src Message-Id: <20150510234531.f2398880.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150510190342.GA9986@skytracker.ca> References: <20150510190342.GA9986@skytracker.ca> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 21:54:00 -0000 On Sun, 10 May 2015 15:03:44 -0400, David Banning wrote: > I am in the process of upgrading my system from 8.2 to 9.3. > > I deleted the /usr/src folder and re-created it. The correct word is "directory". :-) > Presently the permissions > are; > > drwxr-xr-x 22 root wheel 1024 May 9 17:32 src > > but I am getting an access error to /usr/src from mergemaster. What exactly is the error message? > Can anyone tell me what the permissions - ownership are/should > be for /usr/src ? /usr/src should belong to root:wheel and have rwxr-xr-x permissions (those are the defaults). Does mergemaster indicate an error for /usr/src itself or for a subdirectory thereof? You probably can restore /usr/src by using the mtree specification in /etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 03:10:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF11BC17 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 03:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA7C1F10 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 03:10:21 +0000 (UTC) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.5 (ClamAV engine v0.98.5) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:c5d2:98f:c910:41a2] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.11 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 656850; Mon, 11 May 2015 03:10:11 +0000 Message-ID: <55501D92.2020102@radel.com> Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 23:10:10 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: Ernie Luzar Subject: Re: Certificate error References: <554FC878.7070401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <554FC878.7070401@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000807040606090501070104" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 03:10:22 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000807040606090501070104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/10/15 5:07 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Hello list; > Been trying to setup qpopper to use TLS. > I am stuck at getting a self signed certificate to work. > Running fetchmail on the host to get a good log of what is really=20 > happening > as shown below. After that list is the script I use to build the=20 > certificates. > Maybe some one can seen what I am doing wrong in the build cert script > based on the errors shown in the fetchmail list.. > Thanks A self-signed certificate and a certificate signed by your own CA aren't = even remotely the same thing; I'm confused as to what you're trying to=20 actually do. The list of openssl commands you give shouldn't result in=20 a self-signed certificate. See section 4 of=20 http://www.openssl.org/docs/HOWTO/certificates.txt for the incantation=20 for a self-signed certificate. > > > fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: self signed certifica= te > fetchmail: Missing trust anchor certificate: > > As a result, I'm kind of confused as to why fetchmail is complaining=20 about a missing trust anchor for a self-signed certificate. But that=20 does lead to the question: Did you install the CA certificate, CA.cert, = where fetchmail will use it for verifying certificates? You should also=20 realize that if you want to use your own CA, you're much better off not=20 creating a new one willy-nilly, as you need to install the CA cert for=20 every client which you want to actually verify the certificates signed=20 by that CA. See=20 http://lists.ccil.org/pipermail/fetchmail-friends/2006-April/010051.html = for more. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms000807040606090501070104 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIKrzCC BK8wggOXoAMCAQICEQDgI8sVEoNTia1hbnpUZ2shMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMG8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlNFMRQwEgYDVQQKEwtBZGRUcnVzdCBBQjEmMCQGA1UECxMdQWRkVHJ1c3QgRXh0ZXJu YWwgVFRQIE5ldHdvcmsxIjAgBgNVBAMTGUFkZFRydXN0IEV4dGVybmFsIENBIFJvb3QwHhcN MTQxMjIyMDAwMDAwWhcNMjAwNTMwMTA0ODM4WjCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgT EkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RP IENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNh dGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKC AQEAibEN2npTGU5wUh28VqYGJre4SeCW51Gr8fBaE0kVo7SMG2C8elFCp3mMpCLfF2FOkdV2 IwoU00oCf7YdCYBupQQ92bq7Fv6hh6kuQ1JDFnyvMlDIpk9a6QjYz5MlnHuI6DBk5qT4VoD9 KiQUMxeZrETlaYujRgZLwjPU6UCfBrCxrJNAubUIkzqcKlOjENs9IGE8VQOO2U52JQIhKfqj fHF2T+7hX4Hp+1SA28N7NVK3hN4iPSwwLTF/Wb1SN7AzaS1D6/rWpfGXd2dRjNnuJ+u8pQc4 doykqTj/34z1A6xJvsr3c5k6DzKrnJU6Ez0ORjpXdGFQvsZAP8vk4p+iIQIDAQABo4IBFzCC ARMwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUrb2YejS0Jvf6xCZU7wO94CTLVBowHQYDVR0OBBYEFJJha4LhoqCq T+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBhjASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMB0GA1Ud JQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBDARBgNVHSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwRAYDVR0fBD0w OzA5oDegNYYzaHR0cDovL2NybC51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tL0FkZFRydXN0RXh0ZXJuYWxDQVJv b3QuY3JsMDUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBCkwJzAlBggrBgEFBQcwAYYZaHR0cDovL29jc3AudXNlcnRy dXN0LmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAGypurFXBOquIxdjtzVXzqmthK8AJECOZD8Vm am+x9bS1d14PAmEA330F/hKzpICAAPz7HVtqcgIKQbwFusFY1SbC6tVNhPv+gpjPWBvjImOc Uvi7BTarfVil3qs7Y+Xa1XPv7OD7e+Kj//BCI5zKto1NPuRLGAOyqC3U2LtCS5BphRDbpjc0 6HvgARClnMo6x59PiDRuimXQGoq7qdzKyjbR9PzCZCk1r9axp3ER0gNDsY8+muyeMlP0dpLK hjQHuSzK5hxK2JkNwYbikJL7WkJqIyEQ6WXH9dW7fuqMhSACYurROgcsWcWZM/I4ieW26RZ6 H3kU9koQGib6fIr7mzCCBfgwggTgoAMCAQICEHNU5Tx9a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJKoZIhvcN AQELBQAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAO BgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhD T01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBD QTAeFw0xNTAzMzAwMDAwMDBaFw0xODAzMjkyMzU5NTlaMIH6MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEOMAwG A1UEERMFMjIxNTAxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlZBMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtTcHJpbmdmaWVsZDEaMBgGA1UE CRMRNjkxNyBSaWRnZXdheSBEci4xFTATBgNVBAoTDEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbDEyMDAGA1UECxMp SXNzdWVkIHRocm91Z2ggSm9uIFQuIFJhZGVsIEUtUEtJIE1hbmFnZXIxHzAdBgNVBAsTFkNv cnBvcmF0ZSBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwxEjAQBgNVBAMTCUpvbiBSYWRlbDEcMBoGCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYNam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAN7VG2H2 FtCpo4Of74Ll1UBAf2czZUfeg9rNm587CYgbZJcj+/c+56ZxBDcmSGalDTqBizPJduRMIuyq 8R9qViPzWN238rmVPhpV2PQt8khbJNxT3lXauwK4exK+f8+chywS1eDnesK2pLgQ60n27etj aE/xgKLLPXJjeaficomz3cwcbgCRdi5WnN9ogAMRNxWsD6trO9cR+cMldcNln1m65XXTrIii 86+FhZKVpW7yetIcmNcVkjYhfCAh5UGgyKHfK7osuPXgj9h1nSsgDwr5Q0H41bpGLe7AdcFu viOHdmqSuohVSt/VV7JuF2slx2pd0w0eMoNKUKhrFhFsvLUCAwEAAaOCAdUwggHRMB8GA1Ud IwQYMBaAFJJha4LhoqCqT+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMB0GA1UdDgQWBBTP1gHXRYR8E0eyRHCj/S+H yppC7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcD BAYIKwYBBQUHAwIwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAwUwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYd aHR0cHM6Ly9zZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwXQYDVR0fBFYwVDBSoFCgToZMaHR0cDov L2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPU0hBMjU2Q2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRT ZWN1cmVFbWFpbENBLmNybDCBkAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgYMwgYAwWAYIKwYBBQUHMAKGTGh0dHA6 Ly9jcnQuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uYW5k U2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLmNvbW9kb2NhLmNv bTAYBgNVHREEETAPgQ1qb25AcmFkZWwuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQBLU976AGA/ 5JD9rkjl7vNfRGDQOEffvwseVmLEmBLot8I8vZ50oxRCLdOH0Zd8uN17J5a4xajP3blnMEdw /CQF4f6Iz8ASG7QOGLSSin+nrqD20Q8lRn8oOyrF100OsPRPKmff/fekdOMkQOrJ3MCDAHQ2 fxuWkxupLBP6PzC49qR8uyPVxIPNetMsuyYhAHtq4DJphd1bJbxirDffqstQK+M5R+eo47KN WyJ5PD/Q8ug4clobJ7P5W1Xh7KLqnVI2JffYD5+/EEzMpAsKiQTjdxci1z06TOr/9/Z+68an Xuvyambg6OMzkTaTCyD1sE9QExHj+zGiwpUufSj2vGWjMYIEMTCCBC0CAQEwgbAwgZsxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZv cmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1 NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0N YGkN/M4BGzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIICVTAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqG SIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNTA1MTEwMzEwMTBaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBQaGC8K3xb7GkB5iMGY 7B/zBx+eZTBsBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xXzBdMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYI KoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqG SIb3DQMCAgEoMIHBBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgbMwgbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQI ExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9E TyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzCBwwYLKoZIhvcN AQkQAgsxgbOggbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0 ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYD VQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBF bWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQDJ280pyf5kgh9o 8u0LMWt0Lsy+V4PyCOa+qhi65ZnmMQiOlufIclIP3/vy/6KOFXuEFNi2qvXN3NtsPJnfezEq AMfrC5Lw3zRKCcoHTFkc84kad8dL0XkquapMB/S1NxzD3HJjqjyV3rmN18mWt5z9G7E6Dino EVWb0BM5TpVAo1XoRs+Jp7KxMV2oywqpSK3qBjRRqCZsGhzutRRCHFj8nuVVN/qORLYf0NRh SNo5UP1oIp0yg2jSk5GwCeqs40fjT/ZSl2/2SsCO9hfi64DyMuuK86nB4CCKklUCBxhI7oNR /fHtaQh2TjhkyLcmNw/l70cRrofsyMQcfLFNrZFhAAAAAAAA --------------ms000807040606090501070104-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 04:01:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE03379 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com (mail-ig0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9653149B for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbsb11 with SMTP id sb11so60476874igb.0 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 21:01:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4aUwdXcixcIoFXTKMF5ddOHY8Q8ZuS3GrFEg6TNHyk8=; b=IN9svXxedsEEuIFDnFkdFAGdglV1N5apjhVaw2ObfLi6AT8jP6ybbqPsMzTMLp7rGm pHa6J5M9eHeu6oe7bVAH6hnA02OKTuSU6KNmQXpkM/8qNg4pTwGowzFa8Z6EFemZD+7S pMuPaRdOodeFb662jWqAGCCj2bQsv4wLTD9aR1jmWN9c2dd66C7Wg73i1t5h9iF/yBBZ i8tdpM74l1e0NTBzUx7SiVgiPNpeWG73biCG2o1WBT99WDx99/HtAX2J/TBJs5Gkn8T9 EuB4RiW72M3HhRurQac3vJzO3lyqGNZLleFqQbL59RZkZw9hgkv5B9jJul9Ug5ginisu rIxA== X-Received: by 10.50.43.196 with SMTP id y4mr10659123igl.14.1431316898154; Sun, 10 May 2015 21:01:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.121.1 with HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2015 21:01:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <45289.128.135.70.2.1431009339.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <45289.128.135.70.2.1431009339.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> From: Avinash Sonawane Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:31:17 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BCM4313 Wireless LAN Controller in FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 04:01:39 -0000 On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 12:48 am, Avinash Sonawane wrote: >> Ok. So just now I got 3 mails in Chinese (I think) with the subject >> "=C3=A8=E2=80=A1=C2=AA=C3=A5=C5=A0=C2=A8=C3=A5=E2=80=BA=C5=BE=C3=A5=C2= =A4 =C3=AF=C2=BC=C5=A1BCM4313 Wireless LAN Controller in FreeBSD 10.1-RELEA= SE" >> >> 1) From ljj_jun@sina.com >> saying "Oh, your mail Lijing Jun has been received, please be patient >> reply! ~ Thank you! --- --- Automated response system" > text> >> >> 2) From taogediyi@sina.com >> saying "Hello, your letter has been received by Tao brother team, >> please keep an eye QQ group, Wang Xiao's new incentives such as >> information dissemination, thank you participate!" >> >> 3) From jzsf@vip.sina.com >> saying "We have received your letter! >> THX! >> Jingzhou Sheng" > > I have a motion for list admin(s): > > Kick off the list (and ban from subscription in a future) the above three > e-mail addresses. Auto responses to messages received through mail list i= s > an abuse. > > Also: I would suggest to think about stopping from being re-sent by the > list all messages containing anything in foreign (i.e. not English) > alphabet. Sending something in a language that people will not understand > is at the very least not polite. I echo that! --=20 Avinash Sonawane (RootKea) PICT, Pune http://rootkea.wordpress.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 04:45:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE80C0C for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C39182E for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-193.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t4B4j6m0013268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 23:45:07 -0500 Message-ID: <555033D2.6030905@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 23:51:21 -0453 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BCM4313 Wireless LAN Controller in FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE References: <45289.128.135.70.2.1431009339.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <45289.128.135.70.2.1431009339.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 04:45:15 -0000 On 05/07/15 09:41, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2015 12:48 am, Avinash Sonawane wrote: >> Ok. So just now I got 3 mails in Chinese (I think) with the subject >> "自动回复：BCM4313 Wireless LAN Controller in FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE" >> >> 1) From ljj_jun@sina.com >> saying "Oh, your mail Lijing Jun has been received, please be patient >> reply! ~ Thank you! --- --- Automated response system" > text> >> >> 2) From taogediyi@sina.com >> saying "Hello, your letter has been received by Tao brother team, >> please keep an eye QQ group, Wang Xiao's new incentives such as >> information dissemination, thank you participate!" >> >> 3) From jzsf@vip.sina.com >> saying "We have received your letter! >> THX! >> Jingzhou Sheng" > I have a motion for list admin(s): > > Kick off the list (and ban from subscription in a future) the above three > e-mail addresses. Auto responses to messages received through mail list is > an abuse. > > Also: I would suggest to think about stopping from being re-sent by the > list all messages containing anything in foreign (i.e. not English) > alphabet. Sending something in a language that people will not understand > is at the very least not polite. > > Thanks. > Valeri > PS And yes, my native language is - or was - the one with different from > English character set, still you will never see me sending anything with > that character set to any mail lists. > >> Is this supposed to happen and common on freebsd-questions? >> If yes then why? If no then why I am receiving these mails? Is someone >> spamming me using my sent mail to freebsd-questions? >> >> I am sorry but this was my very first mail to freebsd-questions so I >> have no idea about this. >> >> Thank you. >> >> -- >> Avinash Sonawane (RootKea) >> PICT, Pune >> http://rootkea.wordpress.com >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I 2nd that motion !!!! -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 12:48:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 111DA972 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856A11CF5 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:48:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.121.109] ([85.183.68.11]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaHU2-1ZdTXA0R5C-00lzwX for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:43:38 +0200 Message-ID: <5550A3F4.6070003@gaxweb.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:43:32 +0200 From: Matthias Holl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: XSS in your search input Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vS09dOrY0S/q4NCxPI3Skn7Wy4MBHCb8ptW3Nxht6oAD5zsmqdv U47xNhgIXBTSWPqv7VG5fhKY/ybZGNw7rzfg129sd/86mSGL8B/Rz8XvnExtf3oeFxR9AO8 3qZL1oEI/AkoYUXVty7hhPFL5nRAiTQ0ZSn5gn6Q7E6q+TwrxDFr/QZ+CA7XBXdYd/eieyg aK53GwHUpTXAKSt2koSpA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:48:59 -0000 hi freeBSD team, i found a XSS vulnerability on your webpage (search input) cu mat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 13:12:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 824971C5 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 13:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E781B10B3 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 13:12:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t4BDCErR035066 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:12:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t4BDCErR035066 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t4BDCErR035066; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <5550AAAD.5090801@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:12:13 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XSS in your search input References: <5550A3F4.6070003@gaxweb.com> In-Reply-To: <5550A3F4.6070003@gaxweb.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="va6DNLxcN0jGG944FVdrAOLHhvo9xK8x7" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:12:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --va6DNLxcN0jGG944FVdrAOLHhvo9xK8x7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/11/15 13:43, Matthias Holl wrote: > hi freeBSD team, >=20 > i found a XSS vulnerability on your webpage (search input) Please can you contact the security team with details: secteam@freebsd.org Cheers, Matthew --va6DNLxcN0jGG944FVdrAOLHhvo9xK8x7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVUKqtXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnQIcQAKTvjWWMCXp6IemJc6zJlon3 rGWUrQffjsvDg3tnqtQwqdRJZ8dOIs2mNu+4nsJVfu9yd8FrBDt9PeZMRtNnU67n z9akqQiyH5oFbRhDvr+VI6iQZGxkpBiCRjMhWtgGldzkKYhGiosrldx0/tFMTWba QQ0wNwkRuJ3fbUrCFRCMnxccslRHZ9tYWJF+PPNl/ZO8kmI7KFOyDVo9ms4AYBrN vOZvuOAWuqCh5lHfhAod0s/pAC8AnQZvXSH5MZauCkRHgs/JQ4VaGmFFKrHNhXbc gj6r6pXJSoJjbaUqAcKwsAxUptkKQ3cIDK8O4eFNJH2TqvnBGa/V9dGAULtoMkSr J4HmJdhmr2QVPNbJ4AN/dtjBcCxkQLIaDnaPJ2+FTD0af5yFnVggrjezkw2ypDW6 2uMMj1mxtdVXQTPpfxUmPX5kQB3qJBIrXpt9hBux67cwSABjTzbcM2ajLlRSSCs+ Caojsy7jZMuDA/pg+3aMOoFIXIBJyZBjRoKU5hZjAD3s0M+w7If9olrvToGQWVLr auTwH1Hq5ANJnozACh/t+7uABjLx8AcpO/hDbet3vOwWyajYdiuCaX+K1xZO195J ebOdyb4EcP89hQfhA5ytnXTZCPtlGaEB0XLN/0q6tkvvF+usf/UYU0ls4NtzrTFE AQfUJJ+gOjYJqsvfY+eh =vQ+N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --va6DNLxcN0jGG944FVdrAOLHhvo9xK8x7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 14:04:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4107CE2 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09D01706 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E7A0333C22; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:04:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Polytropon Cc: David Banning , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: permissions and ownership of /usr/src References: <20150510190342.GA9986@skytracker.ca> <20150510234531.f2398880.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:04:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150510234531.f2398880.freebsd@edvax.de> (Polytropon's message of "Sun, 10 May 2015 23:45:31 +0200") Message-ID: <44r3qnfbwl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:04:50 -0000 Polytropon writes: > On Sun, 10 May 2015 15:03:44 -0400, David Banning wrote: >> Can anyone tell me what the permissions - ownership are/should >> be for /usr/src ? > > /usr/src should belong to root:wheel and have rwxr-xr-x permissions > (those are the defaults). Does mergemaster indicate an error for > /usr/src itself or for a subdirectory thereof? Or, if the bandwidth isn't a big deal, remove the whole tree and do a fresh "svn checkout". Or remove the directory where the error is happening, and do an "svn update". But, basically, everything shown looks fine (assuming that svn is being run by root, which doesn't necessarily have to be the case), and the actual error message almost certainly indicated a more precise problem. > You probably can restore /usr/src by using the mtree specification > in /etc/mtree/BSD.usr.dist. mtree won't help. That's because the ownership of the source tree isn't very important, as long as untrusted users can't write to it. The truly paranoid might create a dedicated user with virtually no access rights *except* to the source tree. Group write access may needed in some setups as well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 14:04:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F35D65 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1207.opentransfer.com (mail1207.opentransfer.com [98.130.1.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DC71708 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25947 invoked by uid 399); 11 May 2015 13:58:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qtonixPC) (sophia15@oragnictraffic.com@180.87.245.29) by mail1207.opentransfer.com with ESMTPAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM; 11 May 2015 13:58:17 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 180.87.245.29 From: "Sophia Wilson" To: Subject: Re: Increase Online Traffic For your website Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:26:58 +0530 Message-ID: <0d9d01d08bf2$878d5f40$96a81dc0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdCL8iDlQVjEP0A+QOml4jSH9+farA== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:04:57 -0000 Hi freebsd.org Team, Hope you are doing well. I thought you might like to know some of the reasons why you are not getting enough organic & social media traffic for your website. I would like to update you that, your website is still not ranked on the top pages of Google SERPs for your popular keywords (Products). Your loss is your competitor's gain i.e. the traffic which could have generated quality sales for you goes to your competitors as they rank well in the Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs) organically. Reasons: 1. HTML and other on-page errors are present on your website. 2. Your home page rank is 9 out of 10. 3. Duplicate or low quality contents present in your website without any regular update. 4. Need to update fresh contents on your website and blogs as per the latest Google guideline. 5. Social media profile needs to be updated regularly. Long gone are the days when Google used to give priority to websites with huge number of links. Now Google counts each and every detail to verify if your website is relevant to the keywords you are promoting for. A single un-wanted link or a duplicate content can lead your website to be penalized by Google. To brief you about the company: We do SEO, SMO and reputation management for our clients. Our team of dedicated Google Analytic and Adwords certified professionals excel in promoting and increasing the visibility of a website in various search engines (including the latest Google Panda and Penguin updates), which will directly help in increasing traffics for your website. Unlike other SEO companies we do not believe in talking rather we believe in delivering what we promise to our clients. We provide guaranteed services or money back-guarantee to all our clients who consider working with us. This email just tells you the fraction of things we do, our optimization process involves many other technical factors which can be sent to you on your request. If you would like to know more about our services then please write us. If you are getting rigid by paying a huge amount in PPC then Organic listing by using white hat technique will be definitely a right choice for you. Feel free to email us or alternatively you can provide your best time and phone number to call you. P.S: - This is our marketing strategy that we use the Gmail account. Once you reply us back, the next communication I will do is from my corporate email ID. Let me know your thoughts and looking forward to work together. Best Regards, Sophia Wilson | Senior SEO Advisor ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Note: 1: This is a onetime email and you may ask us to "REMOVE". 2: If you are interested I will send more details on our "corporate identity", "company profile", "why you should choose us?", "Price list", "money back" etc. in my next mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 15:01:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6B04BF for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 15:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4823F1E71 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 15:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbsb11 with SMTP id sb11so72723867igb.0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:01:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AqNzKMV4JpXajzMJxTqNVgUrkiWxyC/L7WvJaYIZx0E=; b=O6NTnyCOKyvO9rMNtm0uR5Q9ITBHFVatov2wOBYb//5RwplmEZOtT2dI7MM6p2Ytyf onUhkKvJd5jXuUpiWzqXWFT2TkadhMKevIeyeb2y0pVcFLwYukHP99/PxmVhLqd/lKwH dOjLYPXMW+uxUTS1+G1jZ7w5L8hT8Rqq5F2k/gYIuAX/ZderkP5oCXP8KF7SoTTVvR7I XEmgVfqDOLbsgVb4znYCWp/ZcX6hqKlA0cJVD/Wlnoz+OE8cOdrPF7EmG2XUEl9adjzr qVy34cDHnzxAB1afS6X9XGKbDZi3l8zDZ+I16GKO4DNEVvBhOvDj5SSqJ7QcGZyiL8mm NTOA== X-Received: by 10.50.97.105 with SMTP id dz9mr2124668igb.49.1431356489617; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.5] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm62776igl.19.2015.05.11.08.01.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 08:01:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5550C454.60202@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:01:40 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Radel CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Certificate error References: <554FC878.7070401@gmail.com> <55501D92.2020102@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <55501D92.2020102@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:01:30 -0000 Jon Radel wrote: > On 5/10/15 5:07 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: >> Hello list; >> Been trying to setup qpopper to use TLS. >> I am stuck at getting a self signed certificate to work. >> Running fetchmail on the host to get a good log of what is really >> happening >> as shown below. After that list is the script I use to build the >> certificates. >> Maybe some one can seen what I am doing wrong in the build cert script >> based on the errors shown in the fetchmail list.. >> Thanks > A self-signed certificate and a certificate signed by your own CA > aren't even remotely the same thing; I'm confused as to what you're > trying to actually do. The list of openssl commands you give > shouldn't result in a self-signed certificate. See section 4 of > http://www.openssl.org/docs/HOWTO/certificates.txt for the incantation > for a self-signed certificate. What I am trying to do is get TLS working on my pop3 qpopper server without paying for a official ca cert. I have tried both the self-signed certificate method which I posted as part of the original post and a certificate signed by my own CA using CA.pl script both with no joy. I edited the openssl.cnf file to default to the correct values for the items it prompts you for so I always get the same values. > >> >> >> fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: self signed >> certificate >> fetchmail: Missing trust anchor certificate: >> >> > As a result, I'm kind of confused as to why fetchmail is complaining > about a missing trust anchor for a self-signed certificate. But that > does lead to the question: Did you install the CA certificate, > CA.cert, where fetchmail will use it for verifying certificates? You > should also realize that if you want to use your own CA, you're much > better off not creating a new one willy-nilly, as you need to install > the CA cert for every client which you want to actually verify the > certificates signed by that CA. See > http://lists.ccil.org/pipermail/fetchmail-friends/2006-April/010051.html > for more. Fetchmail is being used as a diagnostic tool. Fetchmail will follow how a pop3 server is configured and in my case I am trying to test my pop3 qpopper server for TLS. From the original post posted fetchmail log you see that the pop3 server is offering STLS. This is what I am expecting. Then the log shows the certs are missing a anchor point. The posted cert build script is not some thing I pulled out of the air or something I make up as a guess. I have a few different combinations of openssl command sequences form different articles I read on the internet and all of them get the same error. I just point qpopper to use the key & cert files made separately by openssl commands. What sequence of openssl commands do you suggest I use? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 16:24:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FC2EA1B; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9370D18E3; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id t4BGOgE4028659; Tue, 12 May 2015 02:24:42 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 02:24:42 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Avinash Sonawane cc: Valeri Galtsev , postmaster@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BCM4313 Wireless LAN Controller in FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20150512000420.C69409@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:24:48 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 571, Issue 1, Message: 6 On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:31:17 +0530 Avinash Sonawane wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 12:48 am, Avinash Sonawane wrote: > >> Ok. So just now I got 3 mails in Chinese (I think) with the subject > >> "??????????? ???BCM4313 Wireless LAN Controller in FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE" > >> > >> 1) From ljj_jun@sina.com > >> saying "Oh, your mail Lijing Jun has been received, please be patient > >> reply! ~ Thank you! --- --- Automated response system" >> text> > >> > >> 2) From taogediyi@sina.com > >> saying "Hello, your letter has been received by Tao brother team, > >> please keep an eye QQ group, Wang Xiao's new incentives such as > >> information dissemination, thank you participate!" > >> > >> 3) From jzsf@vip.sina.com > >> saying "We have received your letter! > >> THX! > >> Jingzhou Sheng" Avinash, just to confirm: these were private messages sent directly to you, and not to the list, right? As you're fairly new to this list, I'll point out below some things you may not be aware of - though some other responders to this thread should know better. So should I, of course, but in order to try heading off the usual three or four times a year this sort of thing comes up, generating vastly more traffic than the original spam, I hope to clear up a couple of things. Valeri wrote: > > I have a motion for list admin(s): > > > > Kick off the list (and ban from subscription in a future) the above three > > e-mail addresses. Auto responses to messages received through mail list is > > an abuse. 1) This is an unmoderated list, and DOES NOT require subscription to post. It's been that way at least the last 17 years I've been around, despite at least one or two attempts per year to change that policy, all of which fail for the very good reason that this list is advertised as the point of first contact for issues people may be having with FreeBSD, and is advised as such on login by /etc/motd by default. 2) The sort of messages referred to here - sent as responses to new posts to the list by some people, to some people - are not ABLE to be controlled by the list admins, being the team at postmaster@freebsd.org; they can only do something about posts directly TO the list(s). 3) Anyone on the planet can subscribe - or just scan the list archives - to extract email addresses of posters. It's clear than many spammers and scammers have done so and will continue to do so. Even most of the lists that require subscription to post also provide public archives. 4) If you wish to complain about spam TO/ON the list, there are several things you should do to prepare a meaningful message to the only folks who can do anything about it, the team at postmaster@freebsd.org : a) don't bother postmaster@ with complaints about not uncommon one-off drive-by spam from - particularly, these days - SEO scammers who've "noticed problems with your website .." or people offering great deals on blow-up dolls or skyhooks or whatever. Best just let them go by. b) if you find more than one persistent spam from a particular address, forward postmaster@ copies including COMPLETE MESSAGE HEADERS. Without all of the 'Received: ' and such headers, you're wasting their time. c) be patient; looking after scores of lists is no easy task. If your message is informative and polite, you can generally expect a response. d) don't post messages about spam, or in reply to spam, to the list(s). ( Hat: the exception that proves the rule :) > > Also: I would suggest to think about stopping from being re-sent by the > > list all messages containing anything in foreign (i.e. not English) > > alphabet. Sending something in a language that people will not understand > > is at the very least not polite. UTF-8, commonly seen these days, accomodates many language alphabets. In the '80s-'90s Fidonet community there were generally just two rules: Be not excessively annoying and Be not too easily annoyed. Or to paraphrase some IETF RFCs: Be generous and forgiving of your received data, and strive to be strictly correct in what you transmit. FreeBSD is an international community; people make lots of allowances for non-native English speakers, including many developers, and indeed of atrocious spelling and grammar by not a few natives to the language. > I echo that! Yes you did, but it's not really helpful. It's your posted thread, and fortunately most responses have been helpful regarding your Wifi issue. > Avinash Sonawane (RootKea) > PICT, Pune > http://rootkea.wordpress.com Interesting. I hope you'll enjoy your experiences with FreeBSD. cheers, Ian [ please do not reply to this message, except privately :-] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 19:02:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E7A7FF for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CA51C41 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:02:26 +0000 (UTC) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.5 (ClamAV engine v0.98.5) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:bc51:271e:368b:604b] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.11 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 657221 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:02:22 +0000 Message-ID: <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:02:22 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: c_rehash pgm missing from 10.1 References: <554E3771.5060709@gmail.com> <20150509180516.3471c1ae@curlew.lan> <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060109060306090607070803" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:02:26 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060109060306090607070803 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/9/15 1:17 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > =20 > The real question is why is it not included in the base system? > Things might get better if you install source; I swear we discussed that = in one of the gazillion threads you've kicked off. Or more precisely,=20 the fact that CA.pl is installed in /usr/src along with other openssl=20 utilities that come along with the base version of openssl. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms060109060306090607070803 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIKrzCC BK8wggOXoAMCAQICEQDgI8sVEoNTia1hbnpUZ2shMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMG8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlNFMRQwEgYDVQQKEwtBZGRUcnVzdCBBQjEmMCQGA1UECxMdQWRkVHJ1c3QgRXh0ZXJu YWwgVFRQIE5ldHdvcmsxIjAgBgNVBAMTGUFkZFRydXN0IEV4dGVybmFsIENBIFJvb3QwHhcN MTQxMjIyMDAwMDAwWhcNMjAwNTMwMTA0ODM4WjCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgT EkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RP IENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNh dGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKC AQEAibEN2npTGU5wUh28VqYGJre4SeCW51Gr8fBaE0kVo7SMG2C8elFCp3mMpCLfF2FOkdV2 IwoU00oCf7YdCYBupQQ92bq7Fv6hh6kuQ1JDFnyvMlDIpk9a6QjYz5MlnHuI6DBk5qT4VoD9 KiQUMxeZrETlaYujRgZLwjPU6UCfBrCxrJNAubUIkzqcKlOjENs9IGE8VQOO2U52JQIhKfqj fHF2T+7hX4Hp+1SA28N7NVK3hN4iPSwwLTF/Wb1SN7AzaS1D6/rWpfGXd2dRjNnuJ+u8pQc4 doykqTj/34z1A6xJvsr3c5k6DzKrnJU6Ez0ORjpXdGFQvsZAP8vk4p+iIQIDAQABo4IBFzCC ARMwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUrb2YejS0Jvf6xCZU7wO94CTLVBowHQYDVR0OBBYEFJJha4LhoqCq T+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBhjASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMB0GA1Ud JQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBDARBgNVHSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwRAYDVR0fBD0w OzA5oDegNYYzaHR0cDovL2NybC51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tL0FkZFRydXN0RXh0ZXJuYWxDQVJv b3QuY3JsMDUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBCkwJzAlBggrBgEFBQcwAYYZaHR0cDovL29jc3AudXNlcnRy dXN0LmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAGypurFXBOquIxdjtzVXzqmthK8AJECOZD8Vm am+x9bS1d14PAmEA330F/hKzpICAAPz7HVtqcgIKQbwFusFY1SbC6tVNhPv+gpjPWBvjImOc Uvi7BTarfVil3qs7Y+Xa1XPv7OD7e+Kj//BCI5zKto1NPuRLGAOyqC3U2LtCS5BphRDbpjc0 6HvgARClnMo6x59PiDRuimXQGoq7qdzKyjbR9PzCZCk1r9axp3ER0gNDsY8+muyeMlP0dpLK hjQHuSzK5hxK2JkNwYbikJL7WkJqIyEQ6WXH9dW7fuqMhSACYurROgcsWcWZM/I4ieW26RZ6 H3kU9koQGib6fIr7mzCCBfgwggTgoAMCAQICEHNU5Tx9a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJKoZIhvcN AQELBQAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAO BgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhD T01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBD QTAeFw0xNTAzMzAwMDAwMDBaFw0xODAzMjkyMzU5NTlaMIH6MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEOMAwG A1UEERMFMjIxNTAxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlZBMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtTcHJpbmdmaWVsZDEaMBgGA1UE CRMRNjkxNyBSaWRnZXdheSBEci4xFTATBgNVBAoTDEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbDEyMDAGA1UECxMp SXNzdWVkIHRocm91Z2ggSm9uIFQuIFJhZGVsIEUtUEtJIE1hbmFnZXIxHzAdBgNVBAsTFkNv cnBvcmF0ZSBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwxEjAQBgNVBAMTCUpvbiBSYWRlbDEcMBoGCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYNam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAN7VG2H2 FtCpo4Of74Ll1UBAf2czZUfeg9rNm587CYgbZJcj+/c+56ZxBDcmSGalDTqBizPJduRMIuyq 8R9qViPzWN238rmVPhpV2PQt8khbJNxT3lXauwK4exK+f8+chywS1eDnesK2pLgQ60n27etj aE/xgKLLPXJjeaficomz3cwcbgCRdi5WnN9ogAMRNxWsD6trO9cR+cMldcNln1m65XXTrIii 86+FhZKVpW7yetIcmNcVkjYhfCAh5UGgyKHfK7osuPXgj9h1nSsgDwr5Q0H41bpGLe7AdcFu viOHdmqSuohVSt/VV7JuF2slx2pd0w0eMoNKUKhrFhFsvLUCAwEAAaOCAdUwggHRMB8GA1Ud IwQYMBaAFJJha4LhoqCqT+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMB0GA1UdDgQWBBTP1gHXRYR8E0eyRHCj/S+H yppC7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcD BAYIKwYBBQUHAwIwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAwUwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYd aHR0cHM6Ly9zZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwXQYDVR0fBFYwVDBSoFCgToZMaHR0cDov L2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPU0hBMjU2Q2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRT ZWN1cmVFbWFpbENBLmNybDCBkAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgYMwgYAwWAYIKwYBBQUHMAKGTGh0dHA6 Ly9jcnQuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uYW5k U2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLmNvbW9kb2NhLmNv bTAYBgNVHREEETAPgQ1qb25AcmFkZWwuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQBLU976AGA/ 5JD9rkjl7vNfRGDQOEffvwseVmLEmBLot8I8vZ50oxRCLdOH0Zd8uN17J5a4xajP3blnMEdw /CQF4f6Iz8ASG7QOGLSSin+nrqD20Q8lRn8oOyrF100OsPRPKmff/fekdOMkQOrJ3MCDAHQ2 fxuWkxupLBP6PzC49qR8uyPVxIPNetMsuyYhAHtq4DJphd1bJbxirDffqstQK+M5R+eo47KN WyJ5PD/Q8ug4clobJ7P5W1Xh7KLqnVI2JffYD5+/EEzMpAsKiQTjdxci1z06TOr/9/Z+68an Xuvyambg6OMzkTaTCyD1sE9QExHj+zGiwpUufSj2vGWjMYIEMTCCBC0CAQEwgbAwgZsxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZv cmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1 NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0N YGkN/M4BGzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIICVTAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqG SIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNTA1MTExOTAyMjJaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBTjfSBXn/pJj8I2Xfes P7cO9crQIzBsBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xXzBdMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYI KoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqG SIb3DQMCAgEoMIHBBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgbMwgbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQI ExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9E TyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzCBwwYLKoZIhvcN AQkQAgsxgbOggbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0 ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYD VQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBF bWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQDV4VJ7kjpRP9zf CPVlJH78iyYGGCA6lbLYOO+TGIABKU3/v0VxziwM7pVjOZ0lekai1h3kS/nh5+2r0Zy2org4 z0k7qJln7YEpMjtqLHZjSstTaPE/uK7NhaUHOrwde90z11Fhr1ie1WIA9MF66Vj3+Zl4w+YK KpnLn0+zqOINp1KKD7g8N8DN7YDgj+gOMXVxvo6ARlC1gUEDKRPuZaCL0mP0fJfsicEe66Mt Z2hqj4SBLttaFIw1J/H16QRm1lEsfMSonuiU4qrVibcGkHejdgxzy/k5FMPMl6+DFWENbXK/ FpaGYh/54DVwTPfh/uOFtkt1IZ7DZWrYset1fZK2AAAAAAAA --------------ms060109060306090607070803-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 19:40:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2A3349 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6697A1FB0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so131792601ied.1 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=933zp2MI2TUB+QIY9WUBL7NyMb2VI7SelMMqr3dU0AE=; b=uGdRusdOsdmk9OF8Z1CHdQsQQwQKjBd9G/IdWKZxKWjFgxgpvf97qj0O4DCFzp86Ie zk+1TfGeBPKgfw+FZBplNiSV03FFpBb+lGwVeWWMjQojJOHE+3HqCBGfVREpQvktl45D omKdJwMByynLnGuF0du33RCcs5t4fO8dvVB7DIXgdujiTs8YSmLhmPtONLKuePbbFuBJ pe5m/eEH2czIlBJX+VUOAuKcoyUqUa19nyhINNjisPcBTRl57LK7O5OSQjx9RqFaVger ATEKd+ZkTITDGxCJSr7OPH7B96mRs9p+umUCIwL/z8gliNrsC/7BDWe0m5c7xy2GATAD CYlQ== X-Received: by 10.107.135.35 with SMTP id j35mr14774710iod.91.1431373224643; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.5] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y124sm10350304iod.13.2015.05.11.12.40.23 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <555105C1.50401@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:40:49 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Radel CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: c_rehash pgm missing from 10.1 References: <554E3771.5060709@gmail.com> <20150509180516.3471c1ae@curlew.lan> <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:25 -0000 Jon Radel wrote: > On 5/9/15 1:17 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: >> The real question is why is it not included in the base system? >> > Things might get better if you install source; I swear we discussed > that in one of the gazillion threads you've kicked off. Or more > precisely, the fact that CA.pl is installed in /usr/src along with > other openssl utilities that come along with the base version of openssl. > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > Well I do install a fresh operating system from a .iso file every time a new RELEASE is published . Its my understanding that the RELEASE build is from a system maintained from source. So there is no reason for a .iso installed OS to be any different from a OS installed from source. If there is a difference then the RELEASE build method has a big problem. Also missing is c_client and the CA.pl & CA.sh scripts from a base op install from a .iso cdrom. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 19:40:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56693CF for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8A71058 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:44 +0000 (UTC) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.5 (ClamAV engine v0.98.5) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:bc51:271e:368b:604b] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.11 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 657248 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:43 +0000 Message-ID: <555105BA.4010702@radel.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:40:42 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Certificate error References: <554FC878.7070401@gmail.com> <55501D92.2020102@radel.com> <5550C454.60202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5550C454.60202@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms070004020104070304070409" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:45 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070004020104070304070409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/11/15 11:01 AM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > >>> >>> >>> fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: self signed=20 >>> certificate >>> fetchmail: Missing trust anchor certificate: >>> >>> >> As a result, I'm kind of confused as to why fetchmail is complaining=20 >> about a missing trust anchor for a self-signed certificate. But that = >> does lead to the question: Did you install the CA certificate,=20 >> CA.cert, where fetchmail will use it for verifying certificates? You=20 >> should also realize that if you want to use your own CA, you're much=20 >> better off not creating a new one willy-nilly, as you need to install = >> the CA cert for every client which you want to actually verify the=20 >> certificates signed by that CA. See=20 >> http://lists.ccil.org/pipermail/fetchmail-friends/2006-April/010051.ht= ml=20 >> for more. > Fetchmail is being used as a diagnostic tool. Fetchmail will follow=20 > how a pop3 server is configured and in my case I am trying to test my=20 > pop3 qpopper server for TLS. From the original post posted fetchmail=20 > log you see that the pop3 server is offering STLS. This is what I am=20 > expecting. Then the log shows the certs are missing a anchor point.=20 Hence my question as to whether you installed the CA.cert for=20 fetchmail. Which you appear to have not answered. Nor do you seem to=20 have read the reference on the fetchmail mailing list that addresses how = to either make fetchmail less picky about certificates or install the CA = root certificate. > The posted cert build script is not some thing I pulled out of the air = > or something I make up as a guess.=20 Never said you were. I did point out that you were showing commands to=20 sign a certificate with your own CA in an e-mail where you were=20 complaining about being unable to get a self-signed certificate to=20 work. If you're mixing and matching bits and pieces of different=20 experiments in the same question, this rapidly becomes even more of a=20 futile exercise than it already is. > I have a few different combinations of openssl command sequences form = > different articles I read on the internet and all of them get the same = > error. I just point qpopper to use the key & cert files made=20 > separately by openssl commands.=20 Yeah, but the last little bit of logging doesn't have qpopper the least=20 bit upset so far as I can tell; it's got fetchmail upset. What does=20 fetchmail have installed? > What sequence of openssl commands do you suggest I use? > Alas, alack, I find it hard to care; either type of certificate can be=20 made to work with differing tradeoffs. Personally I simply use=20 https://www.cacert.org when I need a free certificate in a place where I = control the clients. But if you go that route, YOU STILL NEED TO=20 INSTALL THE CA'S ROOT CERTIFICATES FOR FETCHMAIL! I would suggest you=20 search for a tutorial on how TLS works that you're comfortable with and=20 study it with care. In any case, this: > fetchmail: POP3< STLS > fetchmail: POP3< . > fetchmail: POP3> STLS > fetchmail: POP3< +OK STLS > fetchmail: Server certificate: > fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Powerman > fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: pop.powerman.com > fetchmail: Subject CommonName: pop.powerman.com > fetchmail: pop.a1poweruser.com key fingerprint:=20 > 51:EC:3E:14:EA:E0:A9:97:1F:9F:D9:30:35:72:44:EA > > fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: self signed certifica= te > fetchmail: Missing trust anchor certificate: makes me think you may have a certificate installed just fine on qpopper = and are simply ignoring that the default behavior of fetchmail is to be=20 very picky about certificates. In other words, you may be abusing your=20 diagnostic tool something terrible, and results with your actual=20 client(s) may be completely different, depending on how they feel about=20 using TLS for verification as opposed to for *only* encryption. Read http://www.fetchmail.info/fetchmail-FAQ.html#K5 for more. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms070004020104070304070409 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIKrzCC BK8wggOXoAMCAQICEQDgI8sVEoNTia1hbnpUZ2shMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMG8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlNFMRQwEgYDVQQKEwtBZGRUcnVzdCBBQjEmMCQGA1UECxMdQWRkVHJ1c3QgRXh0ZXJu YWwgVFRQIE5ldHdvcmsxIjAgBgNVBAMTGUFkZFRydXN0IEV4dGVybmFsIENBIFJvb3QwHhcN MTQxMjIyMDAwMDAwWhcNMjAwNTMwMTA0ODM4WjCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgT EkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RP IENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNh dGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKC AQEAibEN2npTGU5wUh28VqYGJre4SeCW51Gr8fBaE0kVo7SMG2C8elFCp3mMpCLfF2FOkdV2 IwoU00oCf7YdCYBupQQ92bq7Fv6hh6kuQ1JDFnyvMlDIpk9a6QjYz5MlnHuI6DBk5qT4VoD9 KiQUMxeZrETlaYujRgZLwjPU6UCfBrCxrJNAubUIkzqcKlOjENs9IGE8VQOO2U52JQIhKfqj fHF2T+7hX4Hp+1SA28N7NVK3hN4iPSwwLTF/Wb1SN7AzaS1D6/rWpfGXd2dRjNnuJ+u8pQc4 doykqTj/34z1A6xJvsr3c5k6DzKrnJU6Ez0ORjpXdGFQvsZAP8vk4p+iIQIDAQABo4IBFzCC ARMwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUrb2YejS0Jvf6xCZU7wO94CTLVBowHQYDVR0OBBYEFJJha4LhoqCq T+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBhjASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMB0GA1Ud JQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBDARBgNVHSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwRAYDVR0fBD0w OzA5oDegNYYzaHR0cDovL2NybC51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tL0FkZFRydXN0RXh0ZXJuYWxDQVJv b3QuY3JsMDUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBCkwJzAlBggrBgEFBQcwAYYZaHR0cDovL29jc3AudXNlcnRy dXN0LmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAGypurFXBOquIxdjtzVXzqmthK8AJECOZD8Vm am+x9bS1d14PAmEA330F/hKzpICAAPz7HVtqcgIKQbwFusFY1SbC6tVNhPv+gpjPWBvjImOc Uvi7BTarfVil3qs7Y+Xa1XPv7OD7e+Kj//BCI5zKto1NPuRLGAOyqC3U2LtCS5BphRDbpjc0 6HvgARClnMo6x59PiDRuimXQGoq7qdzKyjbR9PzCZCk1r9axp3ER0gNDsY8+muyeMlP0dpLK hjQHuSzK5hxK2JkNwYbikJL7WkJqIyEQ6WXH9dW7fuqMhSACYurROgcsWcWZM/I4ieW26RZ6 H3kU9koQGib6fIr7mzCCBfgwggTgoAMCAQICEHNU5Tx9a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJKoZIhvcN AQELBQAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAO BgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhD T01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBD QTAeFw0xNTAzMzAwMDAwMDBaFw0xODAzMjkyMzU5NTlaMIH6MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEOMAwG A1UEERMFMjIxNTAxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlZBMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtTcHJpbmdmaWVsZDEaMBgGA1UE CRMRNjkxNyBSaWRnZXdheSBEci4xFTATBgNVBAoTDEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbDEyMDAGA1UECxMp SXNzdWVkIHRocm91Z2ggSm9uIFQuIFJhZGVsIEUtUEtJIE1hbmFnZXIxHzAdBgNVBAsTFkNv cnBvcmF0ZSBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwxEjAQBgNVBAMTCUpvbiBSYWRlbDEcMBoGCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYNam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAN7VG2H2 FtCpo4Of74Ll1UBAf2czZUfeg9rNm587CYgbZJcj+/c+56ZxBDcmSGalDTqBizPJduRMIuyq 8R9qViPzWN238rmVPhpV2PQt8khbJNxT3lXauwK4exK+f8+chywS1eDnesK2pLgQ60n27etj aE/xgKLLPXJjeaficomz3cwcbgCRdi5WnN9ogAMRNxWsD6trO9cR+cMldcNln1m65XXTrIii 86+FhZKVpW7yetIcmNcVkjYhfCAh5UGgyKHfK7osuPXgj9h1nSsgDwr5Q0H41bpGLe7AdcFu viOHdmqSuohVSt/VV7JuF2slx2pd0w0eMoNKUKhrFhFsvLUCAwEAAaOCAdUwggHRMB8GA1Ud IwQYMBaAFJJha4LhoqCqT+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMB0GA1UdDgQWBBTP1gHXRYR8E0eyRHCj/S+H yppC7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcD BAYIKwYBBQUHAwIwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAwUwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYd aHR0cHM6Ly9zZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwXQYDVR0fBFYwVDBSoFCgToZMaHR0cDov L2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPU0hBMjU2Q2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRT ZWN1cmVFbWFpbENBLmNybDCBkAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgYMwgYAwWAYIKwYBBQUHMAKGTGh0dHA6 Ly9jcnQuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uYW5k U2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLmNvbW9kb2NhLmNv bTAYBgNVHREEETAPgQ1qb25AcmFkZWwuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQBLU976AGA/ 5JD9rkjl7vNfRGDQOEffvwseVmLEmBLot8I8vZ50oxRCLdOH0Zd8uN17J5a4xajP3blnMEdw /CQF4f6Iz8ASG7QOGLSSin+nrqD20Q8lRn8oOyrF100OsPRPKmff/fekdOMkQOrJ3MCDAHQ2 fxuWkxupLBP6PzC49qR8uyPVxIPNetMsuyYhAHtq4DJphd1bJbxirDffqstQK+M5R+eo47KN WyJ5PD/Q8ug4clobJ7P5W1Xh7KLqnVI2JffYD5+/EEzMpAsKiQTjdxci1z06TOr/9/Z+68an Xuvyambg6OMzkTaTCyD1sE9QExHj+zGiwpUufSj2vGWjMYIEMTCCBC0CAQEwgbAwgZsxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZv cmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1 NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0N YGkN/M4BGzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIICVTAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqG SIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNTA1MTExOTQwNDJaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBQKUNnQTxRYO+ehgKQ9 Yv5tVB/4kzBsBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xXzBdMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYI KoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqG SIb3DQMCAgEoMIHBBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgbMwgbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQI ExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9E TyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzCBwwYLKoZIhvcN AQkQAgsxgbOggbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0 ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYD VQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBF bWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQBLaaxOWAIeEl9a LCPd/ncaSExwc7kO0qCtA1sZhBlhO2jAzb/rJpwPIJhATjm97fg3tQNoXtdYiTElkt0mCaRb k7McllPconnrcP2+kJTIILwKHMdxbfOexbgAThbKw4qgFxoh/K8VefB3Bc+LoD8guYpqB8+h xq4RBd984xCVCBTlMiJL0s52w4mpgMPnTlfdSB4BqOtcrpMM3cVhryHlnv1nvbniCZM9GnkZ wNehNbZHWBjmeW/euhiRzy6CKzvd7GyRx7pjKh0UhwGFbk3Bh8Dk1pbeEgf82NOl3J/UEOkF dEC9YGp0ncTnqIpW9sKZCxaN+nBLWpbqdgoxP4dIAAAAAAAA --------------ms070004020104070304070409-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 19:45:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F0EF731 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sv01.alojamento-portugal.com (sv01.alojamento-portugal.com [5.206.231.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8D21122 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sv01.alojamento-portugal.com (Postfix, from userid 10222) id 4FAD9AB00CDF; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:56:18 +0100 (WEST) To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Security-Account Verifcation =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=9C=94_?= X-PHP-Script: marketingportugal.pt/administrator/components/org_com_contushdvideoshare/images/uploads/i.php for 41.225.235.150 X-PHP-Originating-Script: 10222:i.php(545) : eval()'d code(2) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code From: iTunes.INC Message-Id: <20150511195618.4FAD9AB00CDF@sv01.alojamento-portugal.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:56:18 +0100 (WEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:45:37 -0000 [apple_logo_web%402x.png] Dear Customer, Your account has been Suspended, as an error was detected in your informations. The reason for the error is not certain, but for security reasons, we have suspended your account temporairly. When you're ready complete the following informations to confirm your identity, click the link below to update your account information. [1]Confirm My Account Case ID: 4557727859 NOTE: If this is not resolved within 72 hours, we will be forced to susupend your account as it may be used fraudulently. The purpose of this verification is to ensure that your account has not been fraudulently used. Apple Support References 1. http://www.selfmadehiphop.com/administrator/components/com_login From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 19:45:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220B58C8 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sv01.alojamento-portugal.com (sv01.alojamento-portugal.com [5.206.231.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD7A114A for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sv01.alojamento-portugal.com (Postfix, from userid 10222) id 1B2C6AB00D13; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:56:19 +0100 (WEST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Security-Account Verifcation =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=9C=94_?= X-PHP-Script: marketingportugal.pt/administrator/components/org_com_contushdvideoshare/images/uploads/i.php for 41.225.235.150 X-PHP-Originating-Script: 10222:i.php(545) : eval()'d code(2) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code From: iTunes.INC Message-Id: <20150511195619.1B2C6AB00D13@sv01.alojamento-portugal.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:56:19 +0100 (WEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:45:52 -0000 [apple_logo_web%402x.png] Dear Customer, Your account has been Suspended, as an error was detected in your informations. The reason for the error is not certain, but for security reasons, we have suspended your account temporairly. When you're ready complete the following informations to confirm your identity, click the link below to update your account information. [1]Confirm My Account Case ID: 4557727859 NOTE: If this is not resolved within 72 hours, we will be forced to susupend your account as it may be used fraudulently. The purpose of this verification is to ensure that your account has not been fraudulently used. Apple Support References 1. http://www.selfmadehiphop.com/administrator/components/com_login From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 20:11:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B189FC for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C71A7162D for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:11:28 +0000 (UTC) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.5 (ClamAV engine v0.98.5) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:bc51:271e:368b:604b] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.11 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 657268; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:11:26 +0000 Message-ID: <55510CED.4040109@radel.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:11:25 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ernie Luzar CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: c_rehash pgm missing from 10.1 References: <554E3771.5060709@gmail.com> <20150509180516.3471c1ae@curlew.lan> <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> <555105C1.50401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <555105C1.50401@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms050909040203010405060702" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:11:29 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms050909040203010405060702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/11/15 3:40 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Jon Radel wrote: >> On 5/9/15 1:17 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: >>> The real question is why is it not included in the base system= ? >>> >> Things might get better if you install source; I swear we discussed=20 >> that in one of the gazillion threads you've kicked off. Or more=20 >> precisely, the fact that CA.pl is installed in /usr/src along with=20 >> other openssl utilities that come along with the base version of=20 >> openssl. >> >> --Jon Radel >> jon@radel.com >> > Well I do install a fresh operating system from a .iso file every time = > a new RELEASE is published . Its my understanding that the RELEASE=20 > build is from a system maintained from source. So there is no reason=20 > for a .iso installed OS to be any different from a OS installed from=20 > source. If there is a difference then the RELEASE build method has a=20 > big problem. Also missing is c_client and the CA.pl & CA.sh scripts=20 > from a base op install from a .iso cdrom. Well, yes, the source of the FreeBSD operating system is indeed source=20 code. That aside, I said "apples" and you said "but, ORANGES, ORANGES or it's=20 borked." I am not a big fan of fruit salad. So.... =2E.. to try again: When you installed your shiny new FreeBSD off of an .iso image did you,=20 or did you not, request that source code be installed? This would=20 control whether all the neat little bits of source code were installed=20 in /usr/src. It turns out that the openssl utility scripts are among=20 those neat little bits. So whether you have them or not depends on=20 whether you asked for them or not, quite irrespective of whether you=20 realized you were talking about them during install. Specifically, when = choosing "optional system components" to install, did you add "src -=20 System source code" to what you installed? Probably not, as you don't=20 have the files, it appears. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms050909040203010405060702 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIKrzCC BK8wggOXoAMCAQICEQDgI8sVEoNTia1hbnpUZ2shMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMG8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlNFMRQwEgYDVQQKEwtBZGRUcnVzdCBBQjEmMCQGA1UECxMdQWRkVHJ1c3QgRXh0ZXJu YWwgVFRQIE5ldHdvcmsxIjAgBgNVBAMTGUFkZFRydXN0IEV4dGVybmFsIENBIFJvb3QwHhcN MTQxMjIyMDAwMDAwWhcNMjAwNTMwMTA0ODM4WjCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgT EkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RP IENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNh dGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKC AQEAibEN2npTGU5wUh28VqYGJre4SeCW51Gr8fBaE0kVo7SMG2C8elFCp3mMpCLfF2FOkdV2 IwoU00oCf7YdCYBupQQ92bq7Fv6hh6kuQ1JDFnyvMlDIpk9a6QjYz5MlnHuI6DBk5qT4VoD9 KiQUMxeZrETlaYujRgZLwjPU6UCfBrCxrJNAubUIkzqcKlOjENs9IGE8VQOO2U52JQIhKfqj fHF2T+7hX4Hp+1SA28N7NVK3hN4iPSwwLTF/Wb1SN7AzaS1D6/rWpfGXd2dRjNnuJ+u8pQc4 doykqTj/34z1A6xJvsr3c5k6DzKrnJU6Ez0ORjpXdGFQvsZAP8vk4p+iIQIDAQABo4IBFzCC ARMwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUrb2YejS0Jvf6xCZU7wO94CTLVBowHQYDVR0OBBYEFJJha4LhoqCq T+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBhjASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMB0GA1Ud JQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBDARBgNVHSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwRAYDVR0fBD0w OzA5oDegNYYzaHR0cDovL2NybC51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tL0FkZFRydXN0RXh0ZXJuYWxDQVJv b3QuY3JsMDUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBCkwJzAlBggrBgEFBQcwAYYZaHR0cDovL29jc3AudXNlcnRy dXN0LmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAGypurFXBOquIxdjtzVXzqmthK8AJECOZD8Vm am+x9bS1d14PAmEA330F/hKzpICAAPz7HVtqcgIKQbwFusFY1SbC6tVNhPv+gpjPWBvjImOc Uvi7BTarfVil3qs7Y+Xa1XPv7OD7e+Kj//BCI5zKto1NPuRLGAOyqC3U2LtCS5BphRDbpjc0 6HvgARClnMo6x59PiDRuimXQGoq7qdzKyjbR9PzCZCk1r9axp3ER0gNDsY8+muyeMlP0dpLK hjQHuSzK5hxK2JkNwYbikJL7WkJqIyEQ6WXH9dW7fuqMhSACYurROgcsWcWZM/I4ieW26RZ6 H3kU9koQGib6fIr7mzCCBfgwggTgoAMCAQICEHNU5Tx9a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJKoZIhvcN AQELBQAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAO BgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhD T01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBD QTAeFw0xNTAzMzAwMDAwMDBaFw0xODAzMjkyMzU5NTlaMIH6MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEOMAwG A1UEERMFMjIxNTAxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlZBMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtTcHJpbmdmaWVsZDEaMBgGA1UE CRMRNjkxNyBSaWRnZXdheSBEci4xFTATBgNVBAoTDEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbDEyMDAGA1UECxMp SXNzdWVkIHRocm91Z2ggSm9uIFQuIFJhZGVsIEUtUEtJIE1hbmFnZXIxHzAdBgNVBAsTFkNv cnBvcmF0ZSBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwxEjAQBgNVBAMTCUpvbiBSYWRlbDEcMBoGCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYNam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAN7VG2H2 FtCpo4Of74Ll1UBAf2czZUfeg9rNm587CYgbZJcj+/c+56ZxBDcmSGalDTqBizPJduRMIuyq 8R9qViPzWN238rmVPhpV2PQt8khbJNxT3lXauwK4exK+f8+chywS1eDnesK2pLgQ60n27etj aE/xgKLLPXJjeaficomz3cwcbgCRdi5WnN9ogAMRNxWsD6trO9cR+cMldcNln1m65XXTrIii 86+FhZKVpW7yetIcmNcVkjYhfCAh5UGgyKHfK7osuPXgj9h1nSsgDwr5Q0H41bpGLe7AdcFu viOHdmqSuohVSt/VV7JuF2slx2pd0w0eMoNKUKhrFhFsvLUCAwEAAaOCAdUwggHRMB8GA1Ud IwQYMBaAFJJha4LhoqCqT+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMB0GA1UdDgQWBBTP1gHXRYR8E0eyRHCj/S+H yppC7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcD BAYIKwYBBQUHAwIwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAwUwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYd aHR0cHM6Ly9zZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwXQYDVR0fBFYwVDBSoFCgToZMaHR0cDov L2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPU0hBMjU2Q2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRT ZWN1cmVFbWFpbENBLmNybDCBkAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgYMwgYAwWAYIKwYBBQUHMAKGTGh0dHA6 Ly9jcnQuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uYW5k U2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLmNvbW9kb2NhLmNv bTAYBgNVHREEETAPgQ1qb25AcmFkZWwuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQBLU976AGA/ 5JD9rkjl7vNfRGDQOEffvwseVmLEmBLot8I8vZ50oxRCLdOH0Zd8uN17J5a4xajP3blnMEdw /CQF4f6Iz8ASG7QOGLSSin+nrqD20Q8lRn8oOyrF100OsPRPKmff/fekdOMkQOrJ3MCDAHQ2 fxuWkxupLBP6PzC49qR8uyPVxIPNetMsuyYhAHtq4DJphd1bJbxirDffqstQK+M5R+eo47KN WyJ5PD/Q8ug4clobJ7P5W1Xh7KLqnVI2JffYD5+/EEzMpAsKiQTjdxci1z06TOr/9/Z+68an Xuvyambg6OMzkTaTCyD1sE9QExHj+zGiwpUufSj2vGWjMYIEMTCCBC0CAQEwgbAwgZsxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZv cmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1 NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0N YGkN/M4BGzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIICVTAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqG SIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNTA1MTEyMDExMjVaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBTPAG3OhYuTD449Ojcn q/dp5lP4ijBsBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xXzBdMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYI KoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqG SIb3DQMCAgEoMIHBBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgbMwgbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQI ExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9E TyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzCBwwYLKoZIhvcN AQkQAgsxgbOggbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0 ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYD VQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBF bWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQANS9KKKU1Jg+g6 9cFDhYTUQC+RHQm3SFDgWcb2AcgpYgn+Y9JBerbn1vSbkUaUBROIsuISbrlbQhDa9jIrsY1g av/MPfpGVGMHNrtvn0dCECoCChyVLRafOT7RFwAJYxOmb9D2tOrjJaS0DKEQ1rIxIPWw8fxa bau0GVZdFooAN1vE47+eOi+d17jcvSLjS7YVjSRcdkntImPHnuV3OMMDPTgoDcYcvUGEEFOn 21iY7b5eIs0/RXI2SdEew3kjQdxciLYha/TQU9awkQiMfIZggq1fb1D7lCojYIR9YlIzomXv QeA/zOfKbSaEEIV69b/rjs0hF86fcF7pZgnDTByBAAAAAAAA --------------ms050909040203010405060702-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 20:46:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B6DF57A for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334361985 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so80033299igb.0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 13:46:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x+glg6m980d6SrZMnhkA3oIe+L/EYFwEVSvmHyUHC9Y=; b=bTiIYZj44RqioTG7TNRLK8BkpZvsYfOpn4IwxKATQOo/K0VJE9rgzG9cE+dzM13UVE yexzo6anu0a2aB5s6HEgUX4Hi6Zv8Cg2JdkXNSxCkptW1pAh+BmHJM3PeqEI25Kdv+bG ZqGksxMZ6gSWEh3Q6eINt8b0T2mTutSF+q2L3VoOX9ewiZOByJX3TfXEw1p3g3sde4sI RjtwHJo0JgZWybWmxyOBReMXJm+kI7+0rsE+hspses3srPW/JEIBw41MtHuN8mqYyrCu Xu14Jt9XYiFykPbzlTy/R5sxm1hPFg20S/Q0dO6aD8k71cxJCTzDDStvxNRxZATbPTEp kdOQ== X-Received: by 10.50.8.68 with SMTP id p4mr6495352iga.4.1431377183556; Mon, 11 May 2015 13:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.5] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o19sm621228igs.18.2015.05.11.13.46.22 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 13:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5551153A.4000800@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:46:50 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Radel CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Certificate error References: <554FC878.7070401@gmail.com> <55501D92.2020102@radel.com> <5550C454.60202@gmail.com> <555105BA.4010702@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <555105BA.4010702@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:24 -0000 Jon Radel wrote: > On 5/11/15 11:01 AM, Ernie Luzar wrote: >> >>>> >>>> >>>> fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: self signed >>>> certificate >>>> fetchmail: Missing trust anchor certificate: >>>> >>>> >>> As a result, I'm kind of confused as to why fetchmail is complaining >>> about a missing trust anchor for a self-signed certificate. But >>> that does lead to the question: Did you install the CA certificate, >>> CA.cert, where fetchmail will use it for verifying certificates? You >>> should also realize that if you want to use your own CA, you're much >>> better off not creating a new one willy-nilly, as you need to >>> install the CA cert for every client which you want to actually >>> verify the certificates signed by that CA. See >>> http://lists.ccil.org/pipermail/fetchmail-friends/2006-April/010051.html >>> for more. >> Fetchmail is being used as a diagnostic tool. Fetchmail will follow >> how a pop3 server is configured and in my case I am trying to test my >> pop3 qpopper server for TLS. From the original post posted fetchmail >> log you see that the pop3 server is offering STLS. This is what I am >> expecting. Then the log shows the certs are missing a anchor point. > Hence my question as to whether you installed the CA.cert for > fetchmail. Which you appear to have not answered. Nor do you seem to > have read the reference on the fetchmail mailing list that addresses > how to either make fetchmail less picky about certificates or install > the CA root certificate. >> The posted cert build script is not some thing I pulled out of the >> air or something I make up as a guess. > Never said you were. I did point out that you were showing commands > to sign a certificate with your own CA in an e-mail where you were > complaining about being unable to get a self-signed certificate to > work. If you're mixing and matching bits and pieces of different > experiments in the same question, this rapidly becomes even more of a > futile exercise than it already is. >> I have a few different combinations of openssl command sequences >> form different articles I read on the internet and all of them get >> the same error. I just point qpopper to use the key & cert files made >> separately by openssl commands. > Yeah, but the last little bit of logging doesn't have qpopper the > least bit upset so far as I can tell; it's got fetchmail upset. What > does fetchmail have installed? >> What sequence of openssl commands do you suggest I use? >> > Alas, alack, I find it hard to care; either type of certificate can be > made to work with differing tradeoffs. Personally I simply use > https://www.cacert.org when I need a free certificate in a place where > I control the clients. But if you go that route, YOU STILL NEED TO > INSTALL THE CA'S ROOT CERTIFICATES FOR FETCHMAIL! I would suggest you > search for a tutorial on how TLS works that you're comfortable with > and study it with care. > > In any case, this: > >> fetchmail: POP3< STLS >> fetchmail: POP3< . >> fetchmail: POP3> STLS >> fetchmail: POP3< +OK STLS >> fetchmail: Server certificate: >> fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Powerman >> fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: pop.powerman.com >> fetchmail: Subject CommonName: pop.powerman.com >> fetchmail: pop.a1poweruser.com key fingerprint: >> 51:EC:3E:14:EA:E0:A9:97:1F:9F:D9:30:35:72:44:EA >> >> fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: self signed >> certificate >> fetchmail: Missing trust anchor certificate: > > makes me think you may have a certificate installed just fine on > qpopper and are simply ignoring that the default behavior of fetchmail > is to be very picky about certificates. In other words, you may be > abusing your diagnostic tool something terrible, and results with your > actual client(s) may be completely different, depending on how they > feel about using TLS for verification as opposed to for *only* > encryption. > > Read http://www.fetchmail.info/fetchmail-FAQ.html#K5 for more. > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > > When I run fetchmail againest my ISP mail pop server it runs fine and populates my postfix server and shows basically the same log sequence. I just change the poll and user statements in .fetchmailrc. Fetchmail will follow what ever the pop server it's connecting to tells it to do which is TLS. Fetchmail is not the problem here. Many of the how-to on the internet recommend using fetchmail in this manner to diagnose pop servers connection problems. Lets move on to certification problem. Is there some openssl commands that can be used to verify the key/cert file combination is correct and workable? I continued to look for a better method of creating certs. Today I found this one and have given it a try . http://www.freebsdmadeeasy.com/tutorials/freebsd/create-a-ca-with-openssl.php followed by the first 2 openssl commands on this page http://www.freebsdmadeeasy.com/tutorials/web-server/apache-ssl-certs.php I now get different results Script started on Mon May 11 16:14:20 2015 /root >fetchmail -vv -c fetchmail: --check mode enabled, not fetching mail fetchmail: 6.3.26 querying pop.powerman.com (protocol POP3) at Mon May 11 16:14:34 2015: poll started Trying to connect to 10.0.10.2/110...connected. fetchmail: POP3< +OK ready <5281.1431375274@localhost> fetchmail: POP3> CAPA fetchmail: POP3< +OK Capability list follows fetchmail: POP3< TOP fetchmail: POP3< USER fetchmail: POP3< LOGIN-DELAY 0 fetchmail: POP3< EXPIRE NEVER fetchmail: POP3< UIDL fetchmail: POP3< RESP-CODES fetchmail: POP3< AUTH-RESP-CODE fetchmail: POP3< X-MANGLE fetchmail: POP3< X-MACRO fetchmail: POP3< X-LOCALTIME Mon, 11 May 2015 16:14:34 -0400 fetchmail: POP3< STLS fetchmail: POP3< . fetchmail: POP3> STLS fetchmail: POP3< +OK STLS fetchmail: Server certificate: fetchmail: Issuer Organization: powerman fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: pop.powerman.com fetchmail: Subject CommonName: pop.powerman.com fetchmail: pop.powerman.com key fingerprint: F8:FF:A3:6F:7B:BA:F0:CB:2D:B0:6A:04:59:30:77:85 fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: unable to get local issuer certificate fetchmail: Broken certification chain at: /C=US/ST=PA/L=Chester/O=Powerman/CN=pop.powerman.com fetchmail: This could mean that the server did not provide the intermediate CA's certificate(s), fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: certificate not trusted fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: unable to verify the first certificate . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 21:06:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11EE4BFE for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 21:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0291C43 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 21:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so80364245igb.0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:06:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=INCx14wDZFjOIxmfzYqb6nQJslOueJpgynDsT7MGwcc=; b=geaEKbxc74agGM5XDabgeL2KfIgTxWQ+1l4iMkv/dyEw/W3thHMCc9J/VdzD9CXf1/ v7LSrvRtwZxFkhBZpSPyHtnGxr7N1bx42yw9X8PeeLfohsIf00wIhE1hQjpY+UXojXV4 tW7gjutCsqrxI8KAh6AnRFCAmsi8x8m1PkCFJZkNCyFrXbO9qeM9H09OboEsfoUQMuIK Vq7TTUApI5Z9NZ4PmV4Ff9ced9NXA+OdcIbAslR+36ss+5lE2EaKAdZa4Lhu3Axy8QLr g689YTuoyYBHIhqJf0o4sQguM4y+cDvSA9/mfGaupkieNXxiimKuH3ai0htB+MM+rd0N vu5Q== X-Received: by 10.107.27.210 with SMTP id b201mr15507447iob.42.1431378379365; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.5] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v14sm667939igd.12.2015.05.11.14.06.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 14:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <555119E7.7050808@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:06:47 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Radel CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: c_rehash pgm missing from 10.1 References: <554E3771.5060709@gmail.com> <20150509180516.3471c1ae@curlew.lan> <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> <555105C1.50401@gmail.com> <55510CED.4040109@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <55510CED.4040109@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 21:06:20 -0000 Jon Radel wrote: > On 5/11/15 3:40 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: >> Jon Radel wrote: >>> On 5/9/15 1:17 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: >>>> The real question is why is it not included in the base system? >>>> >>> Things might get better if you install source; I swear we discussed >>> that in one of the gazillion threads you've kicked off. Or more >>> precisely, the fact that CA.pl is installed in /usr/src along with >>> other openssl utilities that come along with the base version of >>> openssl. >>> >>> --Jon Radel >>> jon@radel.com >>> >> Well I do install a fresh operating system from a .iso file every >> time a new RELEASE is published . Its my understanding that the >> RELEASE build is from a system maintained from source. So there is no >> reason for a .iso installed OS to be any different from a OS >> installed from source. If there is a difference then the RELEASE >> build method has a big problem. Also missing is c_client and the >> CA.pl & CA.sh scripts from a base op install from a .iso cdrom. > Well, yes, the source of the FreeBSD operating system is indeed source > code. > > That aside, I said "apples" and you said "but, ORANGES, ORANGES or > it's borked." I am not a big fan of fruit salad. > > So.... > > ... to try again: > > When you installed your shiny new FreeBSD off of an .iso image did > you, or did you not, request that source code be installed? This > would control whether all the neat little bits of source code were > installed in /usr/src. It turns out that the openssl utility scripts > are among those neat little bits. So whether you have them or not > depends on whether you asked for them or not, quite irrespective of > whether you realized you were talking about them during install. > Specifically, when choosing "optional system components" to install, > did you add "src - System source code" to what you installed? > Probably not, as you don't have the files, it appears. > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > I did not install the source and or ports from the .iso cdrom. I have never compiled the system from source and don't intend to ever do that and I have been using FreeBSD since 3.0. I am not a bleeding edge kind of guy. I install a new RELEASE from .iso and then run my custom config script and my system is back to my custom condition within 20 minutes from booting the PC with the .iso cdron in the drive. I know my PC can not compile the source in that time so why bother. The .iso is suppose to be a complete system, so since its missing these openssl things then the RELEASE build is broken. You need to drop this source thing as its a dead horse. Maybe spending some time to inform the RELEASE build team they have problem is a better use of our time. Its not apples or oranges, its just a new problem that has come to light.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 21:11:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777FDDBF for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 21:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com (mail-pd0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E951D34 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 21:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbqa5 with SMTP id qa5so153390732pdb.1 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:11:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7tFoKXwDA8ljOIPF7IRLsXIiXPft5nw/Ctkr/Os6Fs8=; b=oOROylrpyTZIO1RBpOvFVOBCmfqtVE/FBSElDLStQq9D4Rb2L2+NzbxU+EAZrJ4r2z bGA2lB1RWGDoPfIkxG8A9CWim8J31plv+m72RDc74epN5tDKC9SqktBsoZJH895yquVA Y6wZW37XWSkl8vKo3xJ5S2SSySg3X04jhvHoJpb2c6SqOCfo6QSP9Ta7dKTY5bjyv4Pw vN5xUlMJ1vcqqoSAAPADyT3mN/CZZ9PTC57J5zLZcztymyYThkj4ETFJqTYojk+XFpUw 8G4PsOgtts6sw/GRlL1I/YoQhYBP9myIAZ9P93BMZ14HVZk+m3CGElZsqeFdI/PIskH6 EFqw== X-Received: by 10.70.129.172 with SMTP id nx12mr22218012pdb.157.1431378677914; Mon, 11 May 2015 14:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.125.221] (aswan.sscsinc.com. [199.96.38.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gs7sm13998056pbc.6.2015.05.11.14.11.15 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 14:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55511AF3.3030408@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:11:15 -0700 From: Motty Cruz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Help! carp slave take over as master at boot! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 21:11:18 -0000 Hello, I have two machines running FreeBSD 10.1 Release. Machine A is the master in Carp with advskew 20 and Machine B slave with advskew 200 both are set to advbase 10. however, slave machine becomes Master on boot; my questions is, how do I configure both machines so if reboot any of the machines whatever machine is Master stays master if secondary machine reboot. Thanks, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 21:23:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B27F37D for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 21:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7CC1E58 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 21:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E1D2A33C1E; Mon, 11 May 2015 17:23:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Ernie Luzar Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Certificate error References: <554FC878.7070401@gmail.com> <55501D92.2020102@radel.com> <5550C454.60202@gmail.com> <555105BA.4010702@radel.com> <5551153A.4000800@gmail.com> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:23:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5551153A.4000800@gmail.com> (Ernie Luzar's message of "Mon, 11 May 2015 16:46:50 -0400") Message-ID: <441timg662.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 21:23:19 -0000 Ernie Luzar writes: > When I run fetchmail againest my ISP mail pop server it runs fine and > populates my postfix server and shows basically the same log > sequence. Your ISP's POP server has a certificate signed by a certificate authority that fetchmail trusts. > I just change the poll and user statements in > .fetchmailrc. Your personal POP server does *not* have a certificate signed by a certificate authority that fetchmail trusts. Please answer the following question as directly as you can: how did you configure fetchmail to accept the certificate being used by your personal POP server? The normal way you configure fetchmail to accept a self-signed certificate is by using the "sslfingerprint" option in your .fetchmailrc file. Have you done this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 22:18:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 112E7D33 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 22:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95CAF13A3 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 22:18:26 +0000 (UTC) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.5 (ClamAV engine v0.98.5) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:bc51:271e:368b:604b] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.11 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 657338; Mon, 11 May 2015 22:18:25 +0000 Message-ID: <55512AAF.1040404@radel.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 18:18:23 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ernie Luzar CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: c_rehash pgm missing from 10.1 References: <554E3771.5060709@gmail.com> <20150509180516.3471c1ae@curlew.lan> <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> <555105C1.50401@gmail.com> <55510CED.4040109@radel.com> <555119E7.7050808@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <555119E7.7050808@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060608060203060204070205" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 22:18:28 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060608060203060204070205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/11/15 5:06 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > I am not a bleeding edge kind of guy.=20 Ah, yes, I see. We continue to triangulate on just what kind of guy you = are. > The .iso is suppose to be a complete system, so since its missing=20 > these openssl things then the RELEASE build is broken.=20 There are files on the .iso. You choose not to install them. Therefore=20 they are missing from your hard disk. Therefore the .iso is not a=20 complete system. I'm not sure I buy some of those leaps. > You need to drop this source thing as its a dead horse. Maybe spending = > some time to inform the RELEASE build team they have problem is a=20 > better use of our time. Its not apples or oranges, its just a new=20 > problem that has come to light.. > Nah, since you've made it so very, very clear that you know ever so much = better what's going on than anyone else here, I'll just apologize for=20 wasting your time and mozy on off. I must say that you've exhibited=20 some of the most amazing passive aggressive "help, it's all broken, how=20 do I fix it" mixed in with "no, I know better than everyone else how=20 this should work so I'll ignore all your advice that doesn't meet my=20 immediate fancy" discussion skills I've seen in quite some time. Hope it all works out for you. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms060608060203060204070205 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIKrzCC BK8wggOXoAMCAQICEQDgI8sVEoNTia1hbnpUZ2shMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMG8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlNFMRQwEgYDVQQKEwtBZGRUcnVzdCBBQjEmMCQGA1UECxMdQWRkVHJ1c3QgRXh0ZXJu YWwgVFRQIE5ldHdvcmsxIjAgBgNVBAMTGUFkZFRydXN0IEV4dGVybmFsIENBIFJvb3QwHhcN MTQxMjIyMDAwMDAwWhcNMjAwNTMwMTA0ODM4WjCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgT EkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RP IENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNh dGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKC AQEAibEN2npTGU5wUh28VqYGJre4SeCW51Gr8fBaE0kVo7SMG2C8elFCp3mMpCLfF2FOkdV2 IwoU00oCf7YdCYBupQQ92bq7Fv6hh6kuQ1JDFnyvMlDIpk9a6QjYz5MlnHuI6DBk5qT4VoD9 KiQUMxeZrETlaYujRgZLwjPU6UCfBrCxrJNAubUIkzqcKlOjENs9IGE8VQOO2U52JQIhKfqj fHF2T+7hX4Hp+1SA28N7NVK3hN4iPSwwLTF/Wb1SN7AzaS1D6/rWpfGXd2dRjNnuJ+u8pQc4 doykqTj/34z1A6xJvsr3c5k6DzKrnJU6Ez0ORjpXdGFQvsZAP8vk4p+iIQIDAQABo4IBFzCC ARMwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUrb2YejS0Jvf6xCZU7wO94CTLVBowHQYDVR0OBBYEFJJha4LhoqCq T+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBhjASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMB0GA1Ud JQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBDARBgNVHSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwRAYDVR0fBD0w OzA5oDegNYYzaHR0cDovL2NybC51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tL0FkZFRydXN0RXh0ZXJuYWxDQVJv b3QuY3JsMDUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBCkwJzAlBggrBgEFBQcwAYYZaHR0cDovL29jc3AudXNlcnRy dXN0LmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAGypurFXBOquIxdjtzVXzqmthK8AJECOZD8Vm am+x9bS1d14PAmEA330F/hKzpICAAPz7HVtqcgIKQbwFusFY1SbC6tVNhPv+gpjPWBvjImOc Uvi7BTarfVil3qs7Y+Xa1XPv7OD7e+Kj//BCI5zKto1NPuRLGAOyqC3U2LtCS5BphRDbpjc0 6HvgARClnMo6x59PiDRuimXQGoq7qdzKyjbR9PzCZCk1r9axp3ER0gNDsY8+muyeMlP0dpLK hjQHuSzK5hxK2JkNwYbikJL7WkJqIyEQ6WXH9dW7fuqMhSACYurROgcsWcWZM/I4ieW26RZ6 H3kU9koQGib6fIr7mzCCBfgwggTgoAMCAQICEHNU5Tx9a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJKoZIhvcN AQELBQAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAO BgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhD T01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBD QTAeFw0xNTAzMzAwMDAwMDBaFw0xODAzMjkyMzU5NTlaMIH6MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEOMAwG A1UEERMFMjIxNTAxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlZBMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtTcHJpbmdmaWVsZDEaMBgGA1UE CRMRNjkxNyBSaWRnZXdheSBEci4xFTATBgNVBAoTDEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbDEyMDAGA1UECxMp SXNzdWVkIHRocm91Z2ggSm9uIFQuIFJhZGVsIEUtUEtJIE1hbmFnZXIxHzAdBgNVBAsTFkNv cnBvcmF0ZSBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwxEjAQBgNVBAMTCUpvbiBSYWRlbDEcMBoGCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYNam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAN7VG2H2 FtCpo4Of74Ll1UBAf2czZUfeg9rNm587CYgbZJcj+/c+56ZxBDcmSGalDTqBizPJduRMIuyq 8R9qViPzWN238rmVPhpV2PQt8khbJNxT3lXauwK4exK+f8+chywS1eDnesK2pLgQ60n27etj aE/xgKLLPXJjeaficomz3cwcbgCRdi5WnN9ogAMRNxWsD6trO9cR+cMldcNln1m65XXTrIii 86+FhZKVpW7yetIcmNcVkjYhfCAh5UGgyKHfK7osuPXgj9h1nSsgDwr5Q0H41bpGLe7AdcFu viOHdmqSuohVSt/VV7JuF2slx2pd0w0eMoNKUKhrFhFsvLUCAwEAAaOCAdUwggHRMB8GA1Ud IwQYMBaAFJJha4LhoqCqT+xn8cKj97SAAMHsMB0GA1UdDgQWBBTP1gHXRYR8E0eyRHCj/S+H yppC7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcD BAYIKwYBBQUHAwIwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAwUwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYd aHR0cHM6Ly9zZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwXQYDVR0fBFYwVDBSoFCgToZMaHR0cDov L2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPU0hBMjU2Q2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRT ZWN1cmVFbWFpbENBLmNybDCBkAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgYMwgYAwWAYIKwYBBQUHMAKGTGh0dHA6 Ly9jcnQuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uYW5k U2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLmNvbW9kb2NhLmNv bTAYBgNVHREEETAPgQ1qb25AcmFkZWwuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQBLU976AGA/ 5JD9rkjl7vNfRGDQOEffvwseVmLEmBLot8I8vZ50oxRCLdOH0Zd8uN17J5a4xajP3blnMEdw /CQF4f6Iz8ASG7QOGLSSin+nrqD20Q8lRn8oOyrF100OsPRPKmff/fekdOMkQOrJ3MCDAHQ2 fxuWkxupLBP6PzC49qR8uyPVxIPNetMsuyYhAHtq4DJphd1bJbxirDffqstQK+M5R+eo47KN WyJ5PD/Q8ug4clobJ7P5W1Xh7KLqnVI2JffYD5+/EEzMpAsKiQTjdxci1z06TOr/9/Z+68an Xuvyambg6OMzkTaTCyD1sE9QExHj+zGiwpUufSj2vGWjMYIEMTCCBC0CAQEwgbAwgZsxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZv cmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1 NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0N YGkN/M4BGzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIICVTAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqG SIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNTA1MTEyMjE4MjNaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBS+f+jlSJihBX0WJJIl CSWL6gzvADBsBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xXzBdMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYI KoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqG SIb3DQMCAgEoMIHBBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgbMwgbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQI ExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9E TyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzCBwwYLKoZIhvcN AQkQAgsxgbOggbAwgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0 ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYD VQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBF bWFpbCBDQQIQc1TlPH1rtM0NYGkN/M4BGzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQBb+4unqrqOFkfH LUoSPoPtYp+tle9cHifTxfTz1fT7CBcjHiZ+4fK+MvrwDJrf3Q7v3Who8n5fdUC7uxiTJKeJ A6BU5IpElak2TVa0PDX/7+pWtYlQ0HGIX344XRCHM+j7SADTfE7EKV+HuDml5a5Kx5KCMhR6 46xTB/zuYqS6nrtpMuyq9Go++UDuLl9QrSqXqiG2eLZiObP+Gb8T3qzgsFou77JCnbsIxFKv lBVVLi5MRSq+VPXxIxVv8j6s52OC0nhL8RYPLigD8DXErfgQL0SLCRi7A/bVEaRjzSqmgh4J Qs9wTy+A8EbzkGNAonmpmYKaKBBke65w96/IY+tUAAAAAAAA --------------ms060608060203060204070205-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 23:40:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 498C8BDF for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 23:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10FB31D7B for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 23:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so85923143igb.1 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:40:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Gv01mXJmOlH5XgKsnGEb92CY0dfA5UMuWmshoV+nww=; b=Vzt0qapln7y4xnO0DMMkDyTxAOeETg9DoIplZ14aUKM290O4JT7rAEH3hCQyyHIPS7 9G/Onq59sNcPiTxaWUF9q0t6WNBbInYSdUROS9Eedfqi7wgOjp7UaRADA7VRhW9muner Dt4UkZJIa4CSxfDybE0bSy4DY2L+q5JFzbx7ee5ISy+A5TUmBgiHAQyRkKQaK6fqwfvB +WoeEabBa08/TG1oYDdKwjy6eWttP/MXZLQl0MWiTUmALjOGwIcKvMb0H8b9m7Kci7xJ UWYfiP2clqW9kUTgCsRCKUGXV079TCv628YpPX7hvkf0YasSAd4Mwt5b5zTZ8Bnu+XAT q49A== X-Received: by 10.42.188.19 with SMTP id cy19mr18595icb.92.1431387638461; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.5] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fs5sm169907igb.0.2015.05.11.16.40.37 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 16:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55513E19.3010103@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:41:13 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org Subject: Re: Certificate error References: <554FC878.7070401@gmail.com> <55501D92.2020102@radel.com> <5550C454.60202@gmail.com> <555105BA.4010702@radel.com> <5551153A.4000800@gmail.com> <441timg662.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <441timg662.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 23:40:39 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: Ernie Luzar [1] writes: When I run fetchmail againest my ISP mail pop server it runs fine and populates my postfix server and shows basically the same log sequence. Your ISP's POP server has a certificate signed by a certificate authority that fetchmail trusts. I just change the poll and user statements in .fetchmailrc. Your personal POP server does *not* have a certificate signed by a certificate authority that fetchmail trusts. Please answer the following question as directly as you can: how did you configure fetchmail to accept the certificate being used by your personal POP server? The normal way you configure fetchmail to accept a self-signed certificate is by using the "sslfingerprint" option in your .fetchmailrc file. Have you done this? No When I tried to get the fingerprint source openssl s_client -connect pop.a1poweruser.com:110 -showcerts CONNECTED(00000003) 675508300:error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown protocol:/usr/src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s23_cln t.c:795: --- no peer certificate available --- No client certificate CA names sent --- SSL handshake has read 7 bytes and written 307 bytes --- New, (NONE), Cipher is (NONE) Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported Compression: NONE Expansion: NONE --- I thought qpopper would have launched TLS when s_client connected. At a lost of what to do next. Here is my qpopper.conf set server-mode = true set statistics = true set shy = true set fast-update = true set reverse-lookup = false set log-facility = mail set tls-support = stls set clear-text-password = tls set tls-server-cert-file = /usr/local/etc/qpopper/fme-cert.pem set tls-private-key-file = /usr/local/etc/qpopper/fme-key.pem References 1. mailto:luzar722@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 01:12:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5446DA4 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 01:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A8917A2 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 01:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YryVe-00015H-51 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 May 2015 02:57:22 +0200 Received: from pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.1.32]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 02:57:22 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 02:57:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: permissions and ownership of /usr/src Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:57:08 -0400 Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <20150510190342.GA9986@skytracker.ca> <20150510234531.f2398880.freebsd@edvax.de> <44r3qnfbwl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 01:12:34 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Polytropon writes: > >> On Sun, 10 May 2015 15:03:44 -0400, David Banning wrote: >>> Can anyone tell me what the permissions - ownership are/should >>> be for /usr/src ? >> >> /usr/src should belong to root:wheel and have rwxr-xr-x permissions >> (those are the defaults). Does mergemaster indicate an error for >> /usr/src itself or for a subdirectory thereof? I was wondering about this too, e.g. is the permission error in /var/tmp/ when mergemaster is trying to create the temproot directory tree under /var/tmp, and reflecting back through mergemaster when it fails. Somehow, I don't really think it likely, as a time or two I've had a problem like this mergemaster was very explicit about what was wrong. > Or, if the bandwidth isn't a big deal, remove the whole tree and do a > fresh "svn checkout". Or remove the directory where the error is > happening, and do an "svn update". Just something to mention in case anyone is interested: When I cd to /usr/src and do rm -rf * it will delete everything except the hidden directory .svn. Operation not permitted. In order to delete this internal svn housekeeping directory one must first chflags -R noschg .svn Then one can rm -rf .svn normally, and /usr/src will be truly empty. If someone can blow away /usr/src without seeing the operation not permitted error on the .svn directory, something is wrong with the flags under /usr/src/.svn [snip] -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 03:48:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76507FD8 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 03:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from london.weisim.net (london.weisim.net [107.179.25.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A27618D9 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 03:48:38 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: image solutions Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 05:47:37 +0200 From: "Joe" Reply-To: kansouedit@sina.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer-LID: 9 X-Mailer-RecptId: 8812765 X-Mailer-SID: 465 X-Mailer-Sent-By: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 03:48:38 -0000 How are you? We offer photo editing: Like ecommerce photos editing, jewelry photo retouching, beauty retouching, Wedding photos editing, image cut out and clipping path. Quality is good Turnaround time fast You may send us a test photo to judge our quality. Have a good day! Best regards, Joe Email: songedit@tom.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 03:49:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8DBF31A for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 03:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter01.peakinternet.com (filter01.peakinternet.com [207.55.16.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC0E0195F for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 03:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail-mta02.peak.org ([207.55.16.112]) by filter01.peakinternet.com ({e1c81c21-e4c4-4528-aa90-7a27869c545a}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTPS id 20150512034611141_0000 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:11 -0700 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from zmail-mta02.peak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmail-mta02.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C13711C7C5 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmail-mta02.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF45114535 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmail-mta02.peak.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmail-mta02.peak.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id d-DI6xAeX2Nb for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailproxy-lb-06.peak.org (mailproxy-lb-06.peak.org [207.55.17.96]) by zmail-mta02.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BC4114534 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlj by elk.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ys18x-00043x-O2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:07 -0700 From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: c_rehash pgm missing from 10.1 References: <554E3771.5060709@gmail.com> <20150509180516.3471c1ae@curlew.lan> <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> <555105C1.50401@gmail.com> <55510CED.4040109@radel.com> <555119E7.7050808@gmail.com> <55512AAF.1040404@radel.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:46:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: <55512AAF.1040404@radel.com> (Jon Radel's message of "Mon, 11 May 2015 18:18:23 -0400") Message-ID: <87fv72wj9c.fsf@elk.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MAG-OUTBOUND: peakinternet.redcondor.net@207.55.16/22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 03:49:27 -0000 Jon Radel writes: > On 5/11/15 5:06 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: >> I am not a bleeding edge kind of guy. > Ah, yes, I see. We continue to triangulate on just what kind of guy > you are. >> The .iso is suppose to be a complete system, so since its missing >> these openssl things then the RELEASE build is broken. > There are files on the .iso. You choose not to install > them. Therefore they are missing from your hard disk. Therefore the > .iso is not a complete system. I'm not sure I buy some of those > leaps. >> You need to drop this source thing as its a dead horse. Maybe >> spending some time to inform the RELEASE build team they have >> problem is a better use of our time. Its not apples or oranges, its >> just a new problem that has come to light.. >> > Nah, since you've made it so very, very clear that you know ever so > much better what's going on than anyone else here, I'll just apologize > for wasting your time and mozy on off. I must say that you've > exhibited some of the most amazing passive aggressive "help, it's all > broken, how do I fix it" mixed in with "no, I know better than > everyone else how this should work so I'll ignore all your advice that > doesn't meet my immediate fancy" discussion skills I've seen in quite > some time. Would you please tell us where in the source the script is located. I have source installed (10.1-RELEASE), but all I have is the man page and no script. The output of 'locate c_rehash' is: /usr/ports/mail/cone/scripts/c_rehash /usr/share/openssl/man/man1/c_rehash.1.gz /usr/src/crypto/openssl/doc/apps/c_rehash.pod /usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl/man/c_rehash.1 The file in ports looks like it might be it, but that is not in /usr/src. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 03:59:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312D090A for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 03:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paris.jfzb.net (paris.jfzb.net [107.179.25.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E114A1D71 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 03:59:10 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: photos retouching Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 06:00:53 +0200 From: "Joe" Reply-To: kansouedit@sina.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer-LID: 5 X-Mailer-RecptId: 6480535 X-Mailer-SID: 346 X-Mailer-Sent-By: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 03:59:11 -0000 Hope you are doing well! We provide photo editing: Such as ecommerce photos editing, jewelry photos retouching, beauty and skin image retouching, and wedding photo editing, image cut out and clipping path, masking. Our advantages: Quality is good Turnaround time fast 7/24/365 available Our service is best and price is affordable. You may send us a test photo to judge our quality. Have a good day! Best regards, Joe Email: songedit@tom.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 05:45:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5005EA89 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC34E18D0 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:45:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4C5jeYJ079343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 May 2015 07:45:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t4C5jeMX079340; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:45:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:45:40 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Motty Cruz cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help! carp slave take over as master at boot! In-Reply-To: <55511AF3.3030408@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <55511AF3.3030408@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 05:45:49 -0000 On Mon, 11 May 2015 14:11-0700, Motty Cruz wrote: > Hello, I have two machines running FreeBSD 10.1 Release. Machine A is the > master in Carp with advskew 20 and Machine B slave with advskew 200 both are > set to advbase 10. however, slave machine becomes Master on boot; > > my questions is, how do I configure both machines so if reboot any of the > machines whatever machine is Master stays master if secondary machine reboot. You should augment your posting with facts. You may withhold any sensitive information such as IP addresses, but a copy of the relevant lines from /etc/rc.conf and /etc/sysctl.conf would be helpful. Have you tried setting: net.inet.carp.preempt=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf? Try the command: sysctl net.inet.carp.preempt=1 to see any immediate effect. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestl, | Trond Endrestl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 06:16:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F37DE0C for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 06:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDB51BF6 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 06:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ys3Tw-0002KT-5P for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:15:56 +0200 Received: from pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.1.32]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:15:56 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:15:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: c_rehash pgm missing from 10.1 Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 02:15:47 -0400 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <554E3771.5060709@gmail.com> <20150509180516.3471c1ae@curlew.lan> <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> <555105C1.50401@gmail.com> <55510CED.4040109@radel.com> <555119E7.7050808@gmail.com> <55512AAF.1040404@radel.com> <87fv72wj9c.fsf@elk.localnet> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 06:16:05 -0000 Carl Johnson wrote: [snip] > > Would you please tell us where in the source the script is located. I > have source installed (10.1-RELEASE), but all I have is the man page and > no script. The output of 'locate c_rehash' is: > /usr/ports/mail/cone/scripts/c_rehash > /usr/share/openssl/man/man1/c_rehash.1.gz > /usr/src/crypto/openssl/doc/apps/c_rehash.pod > /usr/src/secure/usr.bin/openssl/man/c_rehash.1 > The file in ports looks like it might be it, but that is not in > /usr/src. > It's not in base system. As far as the /usr/src tree goes, I think it would have been in /usr/src/crypto/openssl/tools - except it isn't. Install the /usr/ports/security/openssl port if you find you require it. As to why, it's because Perl is no longer in base either: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2005-December/003436.html -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 07:32:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDC3AFC8 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7136813E6 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t4C7Qhxw030420; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:26:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <5551AB33.1050006@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 08:26:43 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nightrecon@hotmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: permissions and ownership of /usr/src References: <20150510190342.GA9986@skytracker.ca> <20150510234531.f2398880.freebsd@edvax.de> <44r3qnfbwl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:32:54 -0000 On 12/05/2015 01:57, Michael Powell wrote: > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Polytropon writes: >> >>> On Sun, 10 May 2015 15:03:44 -0400, David Banning wrote: >>>> Can anyone tell me what the permissions - ownership are/should >>>> be for /usr/src ? >>> >>> /usr/src should belong to root:wheel and have rwxr-xr-x permissions >>> (those are the defaults). Does mergemaster indicate an error for >>> /usr/src itself or for a subdirectory thereof? > > I was wondering about this too, e.g. is the permission error in /var/tmp/ > when mergemaster is trying to create the temproot directory tree under > /var/tmp, and reflecting back through mergemaster when it fails. Somehow, I > don't really think it likely, as a time or two I've had a problem like this > mergemaster was very explicit about what was wrong. I have a note to myself in one of my machine's /etc/fstab that reads # Note: whereas noexec,nosuid seems like a good idea on /tmp, # make -C /usr/src installworld creates programs under /tmp that # it uses to do the install, so fails with the secure options. As I've switched to using freebsd-update lately this is irrelevant for me now, but maybe this is what's hitting the OP. ISTR that mergeemaster does something with make in /usr/src. >> Or, if the bandwidth isn't a big deal, remove the whole tree and do a >> fresh "svn checkout". Or remove the directory where the error is >> happening, and do an "svn update". > > Just something to mention in case anyone is interested: When I cd to > /usr/src and do rm -rf * it will delete everything except the hidden > directory .svn. Operation not permitted. In order to delete this internal > svn housekeeping directory one must first chflags -R noschg .svn > > Then one can rm -rf .svn normally, and /usr/src will be truly empty. If > someone can blow away /usr/src without seeing the operation not permitted > error on the .svn directory, something is wrong with the flags under > /usr/src/.svn -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 07:38:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0123389 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B22A1146E for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-97-206.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.97.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA9F23CD03; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:37:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t4C7butv002398; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:37:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 09:37:56 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Arthur Chance Cc: nightrecon@hotmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: permissions and ownership of /usr/src Message-Id: <20150512093756.455fcf21.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5551AB33.1050006@qeng-ho.org> References: <20150510190342.GA9986@skytracker.ca> <20150510234531.f2398880.freebsd@edvax.de> <44r3qnfbwl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <5551AB33.1050006@qeng-ho.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:38:06 -0000 On Tue, 12 May 2015 08:26:43 +0100, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 12/05/2015 01:57, Michael Powell wrote: > > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > >> Polytropon writes: > >> > >>> On Sun, 10 May 2015 15:03:44 -0400, David Banning wrote: > >>>> Can anyone tell me what the permissions - ownership are/should > >>>> be for /usr/src ? > >>> > >>> /usr/src should belong to root:wheel and have rwxr-xr-x permissions > >>> (those are the defaults). Does mergemaster indicate an error for > >>> /usr/src itself or for a subdirectory thereof? > > > > I was wondering about this too, e.g. is the permission error in /var/tmp/ > > when mergemaster is trying to create the temproot directory tree under > > /var/tmp, and reflecting back through mergemaster when it fails. Somehow, I > > don't really think it likely, as a time or two I've had a problem like this > > mergemaster was very explicit about what was wrong. > > I have a note to myself in one of my machine's /etc/fstab that reads > > # Note: whereas noexec,nosuid seems like a good idea on /tmp, > # make -C /usr/src installworld creates programs under /tmp that > # it uses to do the install, so fails with the secure options. > > As I've switched to using freebsd-update lately this is irrelevant for > me now, but maybe this is what's hitting the OP. ISTR that mergeemaster > does something with make in /usr/src. This was another assumption I had: A subprogram is being called for execution from a partition mounted with the noexec and/or the nosuid option. But without the actual error message, this is just a guess. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 11:14:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAA7B66F for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 11:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.vin-dit.org (mail.vin-dit.org [81.209.165.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705B91D82 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 11:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.61.45] (pool-71-163-186-18.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.163.186.18]) by mail.vin-dit.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C230648198 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:09:11 -0400 (EDT) From: John Holland Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: green energy vps host with freebsd? Message-Id: Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 07:09:13 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 11:14:31 -0000 Does anyone know of a green energy-based cps provider that offers freebsd? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 12:02:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4BB637C for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 2.mo19.mail-out.ovh.net (2.mo19.mail-out.ovh.net [87.98.174.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416D81301 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xc21.mail.ovh.net (xc21.mail.ovh.net [46.105.66.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mo19.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47ADBFF87A4 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:45:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.exchange.local ([46.105.66.29]) by server.exchange.local ([46.105.66.29]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:45:01 +0200 From: "claire.boyer@arcitek.fr" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: freebsd compatibility and Dell servers Thread-Topic: freebsd compatibility and Dell servers Thread-Index: AdCMoKgZFiCOUIiVThyjoL5HqBv81w== Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:45:01 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [80.14.157.34] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 15685474552568506372 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeektddrleekucetufdoteggodetrfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:02:20 -0000 Hello, I have some questions about freebsd compatibility. My customer wants to be sure that freebsd will be compatible with the serve= rs we propose. The servers are all Dell servers : -Dell PowerEdge R730 with one processor E5 v3, 6 cores with Intel network c= ard : Intel X520, double port, 10 Gb, 1Gbe, DA/SFP+, I350 DP -Dell PowerEdge R730 with one processor E5 v3, 4 cores with Intel network c= ard : Intel X520, double port, 10 Gb, 1Gbe, DA/SFP+, I350 DP If you need more information, don't hesitate to ask me. It's quite urgent, so if you can answer me quickly it will be much apprecia= ted. Best regards [cid:C3E90A4E-99F3-4D39-9482-FEEE8F1B39D9] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 12:21:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 734288D6 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A9E15E3 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t4CCLXV4024210 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:21:33 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t4CCLXV4024210 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t4CCLXV4024210; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <5551F04C.4090603@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:21:32 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd compatibility and Dell servers References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="50hUPlqhhsSfWHIKivgW4tilGsv0EVhoj" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:21:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --50hUPlqhhsSfWHIKivgW4tilGsv0EVhoj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/12/15 11:45, claire.boyer@arcitek.fr wrote: > The servers are all Dell servers : > -Dell PowerEdge R730 with one processor E5 v3, 6 cores with Intel netwo= rk card : Intel X520, double port, 10 Gb, 1Gbe, DA/SFP+, I350 DP > -Dell PowerEdge R730 with one processor E5 v3, 4 cores with Intel netwo= rk card : Intel X520, double port, 10 Gb, 1Gbe, DA/SFP+, I350 DP We're running FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE on a R730 quite happily. The only gotcha we encountered was support for the H730 RAID controller -- this probes as an mfi(4) device but doesn't work properly (timeouts, IO failures, probably soon enough that you won't be able to complete installing the system). You need to set hw.mfi.mrsas_enable=3D1 at the loader prompt and then in /boot/loader.conf to override it into using the mrsas(4) driver, after which everything works like a charm. Cheers, Matthew --50hUPlqhhsSfWHIKivgW4tilGsv0EVhoj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVUfBMXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnNL8P/A00YkIQ88gtZgJwLNHvIPfL arzgv73afmaBWQ0ioQIlK2o6zPalenoCdUxITkyy1+OWdw6ctKZvuZaQfWnT3zdw xhl4i2CRVRyJn2rv9diXgbOomnLjfzXj51jZ68252TOhr38Tr2I0yS4GLedi75my Bkr96H3cd6wuH8DKMQgaK5N3K8j6RKHJhhwLfM/o6qqWnSwxckKgQkTiJdP+D/ws GnpQScdio1eS7+H06Wzd/NI1v2Z0edNpcRp+QnEBE6gFle8Za7BylNPy74F8fvyr 51E/MEfG/SGBTH7C9ZkOyUap5Lvdmm2VrXb3AZ36QVPwJdRsoD2RUMzChSSGfykS P1Acj3jEXPbebHPvUQyYYinv09gVBVnx+TP9Vu/22hhCBxQWton+12Kg6zlB0teZ UMo8OnpH+tD39Vd3vg/XRklS3a8xzJS2I1R34udz2GxU6EipwfDm8oo3s6Fiu871 hD1AeuGUuWvkNoKJqDMXXmAiuRm6he+HoUTU+ys1RctJYKveerA0fc3lzMWs6tEL kFXvX7T5vSDcex3llX2S60wTlCxEBPSphhMRyO+k+raMrkDGoma/J3xLYcMytxHZ kQwtx8ynz5ji3p9hgBpL+RLk0s5dUtnC/SiAr1OGVp1IeLokDEK1K9TCeJsbTLyT bap00YgnQpZcoPxpOXMJ =pQcg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --50hUPlqhhsSfWHIKivgW4tilGsv0EVhoj-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 12:24:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D7F998 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1315B15F7 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:24:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t4CCOAET024297 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:24:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t4CCOAET024297 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1431433451; bh=+cjrXhfBxCgVm8ftgmp7Z0QV+5AA7/tL8dVXN2X1yx0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Tue,=2012=20May=202015=2013:24:10=20+0100|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20freebsd=20compatibility=20and=20D ell=20servers|References:=20=20<5551F04C.4090603@freebsd.org>|In-Reply -To:=20<5551F04C.4090603@freebsd.org>; b=dbJRA2O5pM7MMHL0rsjAjDjNGZyCWOObiHwhwKt3biLJdfIh19Vg1T0zDmw5bdj4t /cJtKVFDjrz5PCE3moIG/tnCIDhcZ8NjlegqRYCcfkCZwRN3vrJwnzEbTSsh8I0cbD +xJv7A8hRWwugAWor/ZoWfUPrzIqLesz6PtS1RMQ= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <5551F0EA.9080603@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:24:10 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd compatibility and Dell servers References: <5551F04C.4090603@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5551F04C.4090603@freebsd.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H6mDC97sMbCDlLhv37GnfKh70BEu8Slte" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:24:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --H6mDC97sMbCDlLhv37GnfKh70BEu8Slte Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/12/15 13:21, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/12/15 11:45, claire.boyer@arcitek.fr wrote: >> The servers are all Dell servers : >> -Dell PowerEdge R730 with one processor E5 v3, 6 cores with Intel netw= ork card : Intel X520, double port, 10 Gb, 1Gbe, DA/SFP+, I350 DP >> -Dell PowerEdge R730 with one processor E5 v3, 4 cores with Intel netw= ork card : Intel X520, double port, 10 Gb, 1Gbe, DA/SFP+, I350 DP >=20 > We're running FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE on a R730 quite happily. The only > gotcha we encountered was support for the H730 RAID controller -- this > probes as an mfi(4) device but doesn't work properly (timeouts, IO > failures, probably soon enough that you won't be able to complete > installing the system). You need to set hw.mfi.mrsas_enable=3D1 at the= > loader prompt and then in /boot/loader.conf to override it into using > the mrsas(4) driver, after which everything works like a charm. Apologies: the hw.mfi.mrsas_enable=3D"1" setting should go into /boot/device.hints, not /boot/loader.conf Cheers, Matthew --H6mDC97sMbCDlLhv37GnfKh70BEu8Slte Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVUfDqXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnz1AP/RGzOr3/Zbo+KPYXKwr73wF+ N1kH1FQpJGTiRgJVR5HHzVDV6yvpitK13plSBOlQAnV5vnfyupHKpKo9c8fp6eri qZwyy9cvjALFdWw3+2BjSCBKxc6Rl0Ywa0tn77pYGmZYB6IRosRN2Gypy2JJ2R/7 f66iGL3QBZ7LXWkZrTocROBDnzsMedCRvmg9h5rgOm5gdj/SWyok6XISNtuZAv+F n7Vx9rbP7qVL1mQ0t2SQHWdcSJs8CwIhUpBfgUkpBvVsVyW3uewl4cX5JlNKB1sL GvkQF2vbEPSsPp8MqcDZz8bMErN/kdRK5XrA7ZDbpji5hEYLQ97Nr1Ot663k9au8 WPNnStr4pjOcG86HFjKF7G4dwjU7/IP/6Zrl90ph4u4gdNPsyaX6Cil5TqCQJW5P vXyFp+htMc2htjr15WUlknSjuyOD4iPiI45mo1rUW3ELk8s8quobi60bqeFYvJD6 3WuaDJTED0MSxa8xRw8pGhziSLIC3w8+rtU5bqgNq3Dr1CmcIC5WRHQoCviwM6eu iJuyoO6Op/jLtPChb9IZtRi9IqodaqcrIe9JCnxDru+cLpMwGelqOMU+U5zuX3/E XGwMibsogQa9gwgwhmA/Nx0dyO+B+xaFUjkhKZ0fXbq515XGHfpzz1AE/ElrIsVe SIcy8dG14LTgzJqTxxQP =mZrC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H6mDC97sMbCDlLhv37GnfKh70BEu8Slte-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 12:58:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDFE74F for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from geonosis.vindaloo.com (geonosis.vindaloo.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:26b:0:ac18:9026:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.vindaloo.com", Issuer "Vindaloo CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F1E1A17 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hadar.vindaloo.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:26b:22c9:d0ff:fecc:b867]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by geonosis.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F34E1BED2; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:58:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 08:58:05 -0400 From: Christopher Sean Hilton To: Ernie Luzar Cc: Noel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using pkg for postfix/spamassassin install Message-ID: <20150512125805.GA5467@hadar.vindaloo.com> References: <55416FEB.3020101@gmail.com> <55418DF3.4000102@gmail.com> <554211DC.8030502@gmail.com> <55422DE7.2010506@gmail.com> <55427638.7020206@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55427638.7020206@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:58:14 -0000 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:36:40PM -0400, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Noel wrote: > >On 4/30/2015 6:28 AM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > >>Noel wrote: > >>>On 4/29/2015 6:57 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: [ ...snip ... ] > During the pkg install postfix, it asks this question: > Would you like to activate Postfix in /etc/mail/mailer.conf [n]? > I just hit enter and took the NO default. > From what you are saying I should have entered Y to that question. > Correct, you should have answered "yes" to this question. In addition, /etc/rc.conf has at least four variables that enable pieces of sendmail functionality. To ensure that I'm not running any part of sendmail, I make sure that all of them are set to "NO". Try: $ grep "sendmail.*enable=" /etc/defaults/rc.conf To get a list. -- Chris __o "All I was trying to do was get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)____.___o____..___..o...________ooO..._____________________ Christopher Sean Hilton [chris/at/vindaloo/dot/com] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 13:20:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D97CCE for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.vrtwente.nl (webmail.vrtwente.nl [77.222.65.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail.vrtwente.nl", Issuer "PositiveSSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2961E1C84 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MS-SRV02.vnet.local ([fe80::2429:8944:7e75:a194]) by MS-SRV01.vnet.local ([fe80::a453:e177:f48e:9f73%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Tue, 12 May 2015 15:19:08 +0200 From: "Hassink,Karel" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: FTP sites compat6x-i386 Thread-Topic: FTP sites compat6x-i386 Thread-Index: AdCMtKQZCFqOhRhQSN+68ZPOcCGdBQ== Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:19:07 +0000 Message-ID: <0BC765DBB04FC14F9E70402E9A3DE81228557467@MS-SRV02.vnet.local> Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US Content-Language: nl-NL X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.141.19.108] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:20:17 -0000 Hello, At our company we have a virtual machine with FreeBSD 7.1 x86 installed. I = tried to install VMware tools on the machine but it asks for a compat6x-i38= 6 module to be installed first. I used the "pkg_add -r compat6x-i386" command to install the module but the= module is not on the ftp location specified (ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/Fre= eBSD/ports/i386/packages-7.1-release/Latest/compat6x-i386.tbz). I tested the internet connection of the server and it is working without pr= oblems. I also tried to reach the location in the link through winscp but t= he only version of FreeBSD on the ftp is the 8.4 version. Will the ftp site get back up or can I find the module on a different place= ? Kind regards, Dhr. K. (Karel) Hassink Medewerker informatiemanagement Sector Strategie & Ondersteuning T: 088 - 256 8087 M: 06 - 83 89 4444 E: k.hassink@brandweertwente.nl [Beschrijving: Beschrijving: Beschrijving: Beschrijving: Beschrijving: Besc= hrijving: Beschrijving: Beschrijving: Beschrijving: Beschrijving: Beschrijv= ing: Beschrijving: Beschrijving: Beschrijving: \\tsclient\U\documenten voor= voorbeelden\BasisLg_BT_RGB.jpg] Spaansland 20 Enschede Postbus 7500, 7543 BG Enschede brandweertwente.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 13:26:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57C3DDBB for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E968B1D66 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t4CDQ8EO031533; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:26:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <5551FF70.1070006@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:26:08 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Sean Hilton , Ernie Luzar CC: Noel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using pkg for postfix/spamassassin install References: <55416FEB.3020101@gmail.com> <55418DF3.4000102@gmail.com> <554211DC.8030502@gmail.com> <55422DE7.2010506@gmail.com> <55427638.7020206@gmail.com> <20150512125805.GA5467@hadar.vindaloo.com> In-Reply-To: <20150512125805.GA5467@hadar.vindaloo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:26:12 -0000 On 12/05/2015 13:58, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:36:40PM -0400, Ernie Luzar wrote: >> Noel wrote: >>> On 4/30/2015 6:28 AM, Ernie Luzar wrote: >>>> Noel wrote: >>>>> On 4/29/2015 6:57 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > [ ...snip ... ] > >> During the pkg install postfix, it asks this question: >> Would you like to activate Postfix in /etc/mail/mailer.conf [n]? >> I just hit enter and took the NO default. >> From what you are saying I should have entered Y to that question. >> > > Correct, you should have answered "yes" to this question. In addition, > /etc/rc.conf has at least four variables that enable pieces of > sendmail functionality. To ensure that I'm not running any part of > sendmail, I make sure that all of them are set to "NO". > > Try: > > $ grep "sendmail.*enable=" /etc/defaults/rc.conf > > To get a list. > Looking at /etc/rc.d/sendmail (under 10.1-R), if you set sendmail_enable to "NONE", it will set all 4 variables to "NO" for you: case ${sendmail_enable} in [Nn][Oo][Nn][Ee]) sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" ;; esac -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 13:29:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70AF9E89 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142A01D8A for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t4CDStYW025769 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:28:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t4CDStYW025769 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t4CDStYW025769; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be zero-gravitas.local Message-ID: <5552000A.40600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:28:42 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP sites compat6x-i386 References: <0BC765DBB04FC14F9E70402E9A3DE81228557467@MS-SRV02.vnet.local> In-Reply-To: <0BC765DBB04FC14F9E70402E9A3DE81228557467@MS-SRV02.vnet.local> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O7RM6lFwrq3W0x2dL1BNhkGgKTjhCS9DV" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:29:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --O7RM6lFwrq3W0x2dL1BNhkGgKTjhCS9DV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015/05/12 14:19, Hassink,Karel wrote: > At our company we have a virtual machine with FreeBSD 7.1 x86 > installed. I tried to install VMware tools on the machine but it asks > for a compat6x-i386 module to be installed first. >=20 > I used the "pkg_add -r compat6x-i386" command to install the module > but the module is not on the ftp location specified > (ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7.1-release/Late= st/compat6x-i386.tbz). > > I tested the internet connection of the server and it is working > without problems. I also tried to reach the location in the link > through winscp but the only version of FreeBSD on the ftp is the 8.4 > version. >=20 > Will the ftp site get back up or can I find the module on a different > place? FreeBSD 7.1 is long out of support -- none of the main ftp sites are going to be carrying packages for that old a release. Your best bet is to look for the compat6-i386 package on the archive site= : http://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/7.1-= RELEASE/packages/ Cheers, Matthew --O7RM6lFwrq3W0x2dL1BNhkGgKTjhCS9DV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVUgAQXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnM6QQAJU31r0jnl4THEXo8nHwZ/7C P8PXE4YNOY83NfxR44Bp2Crx/zmJlznMOTu+5tUSop2H4mysU7AMhYpfT+k7yo5W FYLzGLMU77pEs/k6S7rvYfK73YetbZbGqduOclEsHKH1egUkG3HkBxzOgJW05eyR W9NTOiPXj+yOtpTGKzV6Ex6QhQ3D37ZOv2ur6YxtwGyNl3z9HzG1YWzFjnUKt4to hRlQfUfHkRNUVdysSCb8zWFJUqQkh3D2mFdZaCA828KIaJvftYktWMLJAqUjX0IR 8v6NVs+RNftX6/gUeARpUtOHSvshLrr5Wawbwd31vt60T6DiJaT0I08MERoSuObr M9uE6fTwIOUoSASt9Fi2N2jPyVdiy4DxcZU0Qr5gZ4r10QwNqr3ROv/Llr+CEp81 aPa9SzA/ABPZADxZu1DpOGUliQP+sFNNuq0+xfpbjCPxliLVQyJV3nMRKF6Zx55e 69ABKGKR9WtyZWUFV5TT/jhRtmevXeWWxMIhmDBGGz5Q3PXtEZK4LJjWvoNctwg+ IFYWySq7vjCUogtbsA4ahGmt6CDrLJEYgrwzUgUsx6Q1kMHxH8Io7EzZKQ8hfw/a R2zVmhvkiff1A+wOoPVfhOiS33bRq5Lo/NA5YAFm90ZUIUdwSKmlDpBqv4Ezk6Hf dhKnwOT8T8aoM+lG83IB =IRqk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --O7RM6lFwrq3W0x2dL1BNhkGgKTjhCS9DV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 13:30:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EB6FF2F for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A281DA1 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4F7E833C22; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:30:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "Hassink\,Karel" Cc: "freebsd-questions\@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: FTP sites compat6x-i386 References: <0BC765DBB04FC14F9E70402E9A3DE81228557467@MS-SRV02.vnet.local> Reply-to: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 09:30:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0BC765DBB04FC14F9E70402E9A3DE81228557467@MS-SRV02.vnet.local> (Karel Hassink's message of "Tue, 12 May 2015 13:19:07 +0000") Message-ID: <44r3ql3ouk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:30:28 -0000 "Hassink,Karel" writes: > At our company we have a virtual machine with FreeBSD 7.1 x86 > installed. I tried to install VMware tools on the machine but it asks > for a compat6x-i386 module to be installed first. > > I used the "pkg_add -r compat6x-i386" command to install the module > but the module is not on the ftp location specified > (ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7.1-release/Latest/compat6x-i386.tbz). That release passed its end-of-life some years back, but that package set is archived at: http://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-7.1-release/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 13:31:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D6B6FC0 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.vrtwente.nl (webmail.vrtwente.nl [77.222.65.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail.vrtwente.nl", Issuer "PositiveSSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBA281E51 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MS-SRV02.vnet.local ([fe80::2429:8944:7e75:a194]) by MS-SRV01.vnet.local ([fe80::a453:e177:f48e:9f73%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Tue, 12 May 2015 15:31:28 +0200 From: "Hassink,Karel" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: RE: FTP sites compat6x-i386 Thread-Topic: FTP sites compat6x-i386 Thread-Index: AdCMtKQZCFqOhRhQSN+68ZPOcCGdBQAAzAk+AAAFxRA= Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:31:27 +0000 Message-ID: <0BC765DBB04FC14F9E70402E9A3DE81228558691@MS-SRV02.vnet.local> References: <0BC765DBB04FC14F9E70402E9A3DE81228557467@MS-SRV02.vnet.local> <44r3ql3ouk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44r3ql3ouk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US Content-Language: nl-NL X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.141.19.108] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:31:27 -0000 Thanks! Met vriendelijke groet, Dhr. K. (Karel) Hassink Medewerker informatiemanagement Sector Strategie & Ondersteuning T: 088 - 256 8087 M: 06 - 83 89 4444 E: k.hassink@brandweertwente.nl Spaansland 20 Enschede Postbus 7500, 7543 BG=A0 Enschede brandweertwente.nl -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org]=20 Verzonden: dinsdag 12 mei 2015 15:30 Aan: Hassink,Karel CC: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Onderwerp: Re: FTP sites compat6x-i386 "Hassink,Karel" writes: > At our company we have a virtual machine with FreeBSD 7.1 x86=20 > installed. I tried to install VMware tools on the machine but it asks=20 > for a compat6x-i386 module to be installed first. > > I used the "pkg_add -r compat6x-i386" command to install the module=20 > but the module is not on the ftp location specified=20 > (ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7.1-release/Latest= /compat6x-i386.tbz). That release passed its end-of-life some years back, but that package set i= s archived at: http://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-7.1-= release/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 14:30:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 256DF969 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from o192254121161.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net (o192254121161.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net [192.254.121.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0CBA152B for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:30:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=crowdbooster.com; h=content-type:mime-version:from:to:reply-to:subject:list-unsubscribe; s=smtpapi; bh=LQTcr4sWheO4uzQQSykMr2AtQ4Q=; b=OIRqdmRvOgx4kZRKxR b0/u/aFQ8tGTqMvBPwAGowQisWBqwPKXTOfC7psvCXHRARe5BOuleedP71pwUUgK inwSXZSj+icEhwcd8zOmDt4qq7zcl/4+dNsa+IoBOAY24/BEv0Jaut63KKhuUMzZ u3lVgygXZkpECESuh/x2GDulc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=crowdbooster.com; h=content-type:mime-version:from:to:reply-to:subject:list-unsubscribe; q=dns; s=smtpapi; b=Q6HecaWTD4ie7WpRrJSZZI0bcRAdDXz1t5z6/uNvC2Ue bv7SnUZqtb1DFXx6n8nMtlxJewWiObymwXO8Q/9I3DS/AbdXkX4jzLoUPPpvoHno b/rrNBW4qp2bBFyZaIjoOxzBSF1pNnfN/lDEs/Jnk6wITnEHm312XRJ2Css9teU= Received: by filter-137.sjc1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter-137.16720.55520E313A 2015-05-12 14:29:06.230697156 +0000 UTC Received: from MTE0MDM (unknown [10.42.83.122]) by ismtpd-084 (SG) with HTTP id 14d488773ea.29f3.116536 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:29:06 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Tran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-to: no-reply@crowdbooster.com Subject: Sponsored Content Opportunity Message-ID: <14d488773ea.29f3.116536@ismtpd-084> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:29:06 +0000 (UTC) X-SG-EID: FFnPVu6lb0A5TuepcCdqxLOfczNEIxluOZzq9GOc07qjoDt+uosH+bCRqUSP+lkhOwN3r/SQyKAOvL HP/iyfrd9vcSOTDQCjG6085ElWyp8/0+1mV3kpK6EpWbJiRnOKVxdlwzVT6EzmFYwShWEEsn0eN3xz 616JbAu+EUT+Rtlx6rN+R+Y744Yx4sBXRLht X-SG-ID: VPWZYjw6GOzHdwkwPeoX9QiEbzQXX/gF9P8njHP5+LBHWZ/VIsM0kGHiHwMUPFK72A92xrXsKsMoM/ 05/xPUKjqAjldKZMKGf10+HnPCpK6zw6CYvvoWaQTPidUIfN2VTPdSjdMh3Eqkg+SuJzsHRGvCJMlH rMGMuL4BJ0zPi7H8s9Moyhy+ohKZ0293EMxTaQj+65RQg+sBULoW+ZgSLA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:30:55 -0000 Hey there, We haven=E2=80=99t met yet, but my name is David Tran. My company, Crowdboo= ster, is launching a new service ( http://network.crowdbooster.com/?utm_sou= rce=3Demail_outreach&utm_medium=3Demail&utm_campaign=3D2015_05_12feedly ) t= hat connects bloggers with brands who want to sponsor great content. We=E2= =80=99ve worked with well-known brands including Coca Cola, jetBlue, Nestl= =C3=A9, Tiffany & Co, and Nike. We came across your blog and thought that your audience would be a good fit= for our brands. Unlike traditional agencies, our creators do not sign any = exclusivity contracts. This means that you can work with anyone that you ch= oose, including brands outside our network. If you are interested in content partnership opportunities, please fill out= the survey here: "http://crowdbooster.com/creatorSignup/?utm_source=3Demai= l_outreach&utm_medium=3Demail&utm_campaign=3D2015_05_12feedly We are constantly adding new brands to our network and will send you opport= unities as they come in. If you have any questions, please send me an email. Cheers, David dt@crowdbooster.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- We emailed you because we found your contact information on your blog and t= hought you might find this interesting. If you do not wish to hear from us = anymore, please click here ( http://email.crowdbooster.com/wf/unsubscribe?u= pn=3DQ1G7K8cYCrLWsp3rtsmPRsrCYwnE-2B1AtKIe280p4kyCe88htyQB1VY-2F9oiuSuDyyUH= 6Fo5Ns1KFfBV11dV9MDdpyhm1xXrwlrZG7eJz3outuCPnRsQpLh4zkALMUVYw-2FOPpReh-2Fvq= nEshQf9zS1fm1G2zsQRY370rfmoTCEBr9St-2BQeL-2B7H4aRhx6P4NWk-2BIw3do-2FM2X2Nmu= wUz2z-2FbR4Yw2XcxpRsC0W3o-2F93vyoTcWi-2FjYe29MubOWdcL4i4DkFFiZxPBk-2BU9ZInv= 5fLadLbeKtBFsLFzqN6zWPeksIGQDiGsRSiC1IYIOeycKrNxq53apW1bxhk9pNqiTziaoSu4dTS= BXFbfNAkgF7vWRqytO3pUsAkv5KNiGkMOIpeJZhSG6AY6d-2Bi40v6AWeTZc5n9ECrH9cB2JsYU= xILTIE-2Fs-3D ). Crowdbooster 25 Stillman St, Suite 101, San Francisco, CA, 94107= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 16:09:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-q