From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 8 17:51:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA88E670; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 17:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4BFD9; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 17:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from JRE-MBP-2.local (c-50-143-148-105.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.143.148.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r08Hp2Zh074651 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:51:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <50EC5C81.3020600@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:50:57 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hiroki Sato Subject: Re: -iface option to route(8) is broken References: <50EC51A3.6020909@freebsd.org> <20130109.022821.161123847814107230.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20130109.022821.161123847814107230.hrs@allbsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ianf@clue.co.za, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:51:05 -0000 On 1/8/13 9:28 AM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote > in <50EC51A3.6020909@freebsd.org>: > > ju> On 1/8/13 6:42 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > ju> > Hi > ju> > > ju> > Adding routes using the -iface option to route(8) doesn't work any > ju> > more. This was useful to select a specific interface for a route > ju> > when the remote gateway has the same IP address. Are there plans > ju> > to restore this functionality? > ju> > ju> I agree.. thus was a crucial piece of functionality.. > ju> > ju> who broke it? > > Oh, sorry, it seems I accidentally broke it in the previous commit. > It should be fixed now. Please let me know if it still does not > work. thankyou > > -- Hiroki