From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 22 13:05:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA23736 for current-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 13:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA23690 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 13:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA13934; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 13:00:32 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199707222000.NAA13934@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Boot file system idea! Slick To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 13:00:32 -0700 (MST) Cc: rickl@ic.net, pechter@lakewood.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199707220948.TAA29292@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Jul 22, 97 07:18:53 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I second that....a small DOS partition instead of the BFS is great. As one > > who usually blasts the kernel from time to time, I would really appreciate > > a "simple" fix without using a special floppy or reinstall. > > Uhh, what's a DOS boot disk if not a "special" floppy? > > And what about the backup kernels, hmm? A BSD boot disk is just as capable of wrting DOS files. There's no hard-and-fast DOS requirement simply because you use FAT. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.