From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Thu Jul 29  7:23:13 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F0F14E4E
	for <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 07:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id QAA23686;
	Thu, 29 Jul 1999 16:22:47 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>
Cc: Francisco Reyes <freyes@inch.com>,
	"advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG" <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	"Eric A. Griff" <eric@setjmp.com>
Subject: Re: Slashdot poll
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907290801480.18348-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 29 Jul 1999 16:22:46 +0200
In-Reply-To: Bill Fumerola's message of "Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:02:15 -0400 (EDT)"
Message-ID: <xzpvhb3358p.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> writes:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> > I think we need to put on our advocacy caps and start doing some
> > serious advocacy. :-)
> I think we shouldn't care about non-scientific polls run by linux-biased
> sites.

Don't be so quick to condemn linux-biased sites, especially when
they're not linux-biased at all and even run FreeBSD on one of their
servers - and especially when they have as much mindshare as Slashdot
does.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message