Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 May 2002 20:23:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linprocfs linprocfs.c src/sys/fs/
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20020518202300.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020518201742.79313C-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 19-May-2002 Robert Watson wrote:
> Great!  Now I get to suffer as I propagate the locking changes into the
> MAC framework :-).  BTW, what was the rationale for not renaming the
> functions?

1) It was more work.

2) They are still process-related functions as we are checking to see
   if we can do certain things to target processes, so being in a
   process namespace still makes sense.

> On Sat, 18 May 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
>> jhb         2002/05/18 17:14:50 PDT
>> 
>>   Modified files:
>>     sys/compat/linprocfs linprocfs.c 
>>     sys/fs/procfs        procfs.c procfs_ctl.c procfs_dbregs.c 
>>                          procfs_fpregs.c procfs_mem.c 
>>                          procfs_regs.c procfs_status.c 
>>     sys/fs/pseudofs      pseudofs_vnops.c 
>>     sys/kern             kern_event.c kern_ktrace.c kern_proc.c 
>>                          kern_prot.c kern_resource.c kern_sig.c 
>>                          sys_process.c 
>>     sys/posix4           p1003_1b.c 
>>     sys/security/lomac   kernel_lkm.c 
>>     sys/sys              proc.h 
>>   Log:
>>   Change p_can{debug,see,sched,signal}()'s first argument to be a thread
>>   pointer instead of a proc pointer and require the process pointed to
>>   by the second argument to be locked.  We now use the thread ucred
>>   reference
>>   for the credential checks in p_can*() as a result.  p_canfoo() should now
>>   no longer need Giant.
>>   
>>   Revision  Changes    Path
>>   1.52      +1 -1      src/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c
>>   1.5       +3 -1      src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs.c
>>   1.40      +2 -2      src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_ctl.c
>>   1.20      +1 -1      src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_dbregs.c
>>   1.26      +1 -1      src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_fpregs.c
>>   1.58      +1 -1      src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_mem.c
>>   1.25      +1 -1      src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_regs.c
>>   1.44      +1 -1      src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_status.c
>>   1.27      +1 -1      src/sys/fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c
>>   1.39      +1 -1      src/sys/kern/kern_event.c
>>   1.66      +1 -1      src/sys/kern/kern_ktrace.c
>>   1.135     +3 -3      src/sys/kern/kern_proc.c
>>   1.156     +69 -60    src/sys/kern/kern_prot.c
>>   1.105     +9 -9      src/sys/kern/kern_resource.c
>>   1.165     +3 -4      src/sys/kern/kern_sig.c
>>   1.93      +2 -2      src/sys/kern/sys_process.c
>>   1.19      +5 -5      src/sys/posix4/p1003_1b.c
>>   1.3       +2 -4      src/sys/security/lomac/kernel_lkm.c
>>   1.221     +4 -4      src/sys/sys/proc.h
>> 
> 

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020518202300.jhb>