Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:47:28 -0600
From:      Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
To:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@brierdr.com>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: OpenCVS
Message-ID:  <16823.30320.849399.610561@guru.mired.org>
In-Reply-To: <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com>
References:  <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@brierdr.com> typed:
> One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes 
> any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another 
> implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like 
> SVN.  No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to 
> p4/svn/arch/...?" war, I'm simply saying it might be best to decide 
> here and now that should any SCM transition ever occur, it should only 
> be when the bang-for-buck factor reaches some significant threshold 
> over what's currently available now.

The interesting question is how much of a cvs clone is OpenCVS? If it
will work with existing repositories, then there isn't any transition
required - just plug in the software. But finding that out will
require waiting until there is a release of OpenCVS.

	<mike
-- 
Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>		http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16823.30320.849399.610561>