Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:01:58 -0800
From:      Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>
To:        John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
Cc:        David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Weak symbols in libc_r broken?
Message-ID:  <20000313130158.U333@sturm.canonware.com>
In-Reply-To: <20000313181222.L34294@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>; from jb@cimlogic.com.au on Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:12:22PM %2B1100
References:  <20000313145201.H34294@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> <20000312230740.A8720@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000313181222.L34294@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:12:22PM +1100, John Birrell wrote:
> I deleted the weak definitions in the _THREAD_SAFE PRSYSCALL in
> lib/libc/i386/SYS.h and the problem goes away. I don't understand why
> Jason needed to add them in the first place.

I didn't need to add them.  At some point during all the changes I made, I
mistakenly got it in my mind that the weak aliases had been there before I
started mucking with things, and therefore I, uh, left them there. =)
Unfortunately, I didn't notice this problem until a week ago, and it was
only this weekend that I understood the root of the problem.

Jason


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000313130158.U333>