From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 00:13:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4EBD37B401; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 00:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C956943FAF; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 00:13:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h687DNE4057057; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:13:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h687DN5S057056; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:13:23 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h687E6wc037063; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:14:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200307080714.h687E6wc037063@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Garance A Drosihn In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:37:04 EDT." Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 08:14:06 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/lpr/lpd lpd.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 07:13:26 -0000 Garance A Drosihn writes: > Would people mind if I changed all of lpr to use something > along these lines? The more I think about this, the more I > think I like it... No objection. :-) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH