Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:50:01 GMT
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/183379: remove "security" check from b.*.m
Message-ID:  <201310280150.r9S1o1da062221@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/183379; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/183379: remove "security" check from b.*.m
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:48:06 +0100

 --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:51:18AM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote:
 >=20
 > >Number:         183379
 > >Category:       ports
 > >Synopsis:       remove "security" check from b.*.m
 > >Confidential:   no
 > >Severity:       non-critical
 > >Priority:       low
 > >Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
 > >State:          open
 > >Quarter:       =20
 > >Keywords:      =20
 > >Date-Required:
 > >Class:          change-request
 > >Submitter-Id:   current-users
 > >Arrival-Date:   Mon Oct 28 01:00:00 UTC 2013
 > >Closed-Date:
 > >Last-Modified:
 > >Originator:     Eitan Adler
 > >Release:       =20
 > >Organization:
 > >Environment:
 > >Description:
 > The FreeBSD Ports system has a few checks on files to be installed.
 >=20
 > These checks are not useful in any most cases and can be easily lost in t=
 he noise.
 >=20
 > A) The notice is not shown for packages
 > B) Too many ports result in this notice resulting in it being ignored
 > C) It is lost in the middle for dependencies
 > D) Sometimes the 'insecure' functions are actually used security (pkg its=
 elf used to use mktemp)
 > E) World writable folders are not always a problem
 >=20
 > and on.
 >=20
 > If this functionality is desired it should probably be a plugin to pkg in=
 stead.
 >=20
 > Please commit this: http://people.freebsd.org/~eadler/files/no-need-for-s=
 ecurity-check.diff
 >=20
 > Discussed with: cperciva, jilles
 
 I totally agree:
 
 how ever the patch isn't totally correct, I discussed the details with Eita=
 n on
 irc so he should come back to that patch once the bsd.fpc.mk and bsd.php.mk=
  are
 properly fixed.
 
 if someone it missing those message then we can move part (not all anyway) =
 into
 qa.sh, but for now just drop it.
 
 regards,
 Bat
 
 --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
 
 iEYEARECAAYFAlJtwlUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EygQwCguBo8cXn9mtzRLIR5Ku26hc4X
 9uMAoKk3wPTkfISsjASW+ZkOgWfZcNvQ
 =QEMw
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201310280150.r9S1o1da062221>