Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:23:47 -0500
From:      Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha?
Message-ID:  <20160316162347.GH4140350@physics.umn.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20160316130716.c10d580e.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <CA+Hm=ZCJEJHE249G96yZJnTmkUxK0Ey5ZWZc8Py5gZLabuXJzA@mail.gmail.com> <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160316113721.cc9fbf4ee4f1e9d930178cdc@sohara.org> <20160316130716.c10d580e.freebsd@edvax.de>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:07:16PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:21 +0000, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > NetBSD may be a better option.
> 
> Yes, NetBSD support is probably much better - both the OS and
> the applications are current.
> 
> http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/alpha/
> 
> NetBSD/alpha 7.0 sure is worth trying.

OpenBSD also still supports alpha, as far as I can tell.
http://www.openbsd.org/alpha.html

Graham



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160316162347.GH4140350>