Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Jan 2015 21:27:55 -0500
From:      Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>, "arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Libxo bugs and fixes.
Message-ID:  <201501060227.t062RtXw095998@idle.juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=p8tHWpzucPzYdySp6HwvrJg8GzPdSKGZZKyJAG7dnwg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Chadd writes:
>... hm, lost in all of that - so does the proposed API change actually
>delineate records somehow?
>
>(Ie, not having the "close/open tags" bit as a hard-coded new record,
>but a "this is a self contained record, ok, we're going to output
>another one.")
>
>It will be useful for things that aren't time-series graphs.

Well, it's not that far along yet, but no, there's nothing cooked
into it to make the delinations.  This would be either a callback,
or a set of "well known" protocols, such as NLD-json.  The same
plumbing should be usable for other domains.

Thanks,
 Phil



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201501060227.t062RtXw095998>