Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 18:00:16 +0100 From: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> To: Florian Ermisch <florian.ermisch@alumni.tu-berlin.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with FreeBSD as a XenServer Guest - how to debug? Message-ID: <9D72A1D4-C728-4405-8101-11734D092615@ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: <37CEE483-1901-4B8A-AB89-654D6C4DA6C7@alumni.tu-berlin.de> References: <F2B72D04-A4B1-482D-B0C7-FE9CDB26BE07@ultra-secure.de> <37CEE483-1901-4B8A-AB89-654D6C4DA6C7@alumni.tu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 04.02.2017 um 10:48 schrieb Florian Ermisch = <florian.ermisch@alumni.tu-berlin.de>: >=20 > Hi Rainer, >=20 > isn't Amazon AWS xen-based? > I know Colin Percival (cperciva@) is running=20 > tarsnap.com on AWS, maybe he knows how=20 > to tune it properly? It=E2=80=99s not a question of tuning. It=E2=80=99s a factor of 5 that FreeBSD is slower. On SSDs, it=E2=80=99s = 10 to 15x. > Looks like he's the one providing FreeBSD=20 > images for AWS, too: https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B01LWSWRED/ > Amazon is probably running a heavily patched > version of Xen but looking at the images'=20 > sysctls & stuff and running one on your Xen- > Server might provide some insights - or at > least datapoints. >=20 > And then there's DTrace to dive into the=20 > kernel's inner workings*=E2=80=A6 >=20 Yes, but I don=E2=80=99t even know there to start. My knowledge of Dtrace is very, very limited. > Oh, does Xen still provide emulation for other > storage controllers like SATA or SAS? If so > you may get an at least bearable performance > using those. FreeBSD 10 and 11 contain the =E2=80=9Eoptimal=E2=80=9C support for Xen = DomU support out-of-the box, AFAIK (the documentation / wiki for Xen is = in a horrible state IMO).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9D72A1D4-C728-4405-8101-11734D092615>