From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 10 17:25:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91899106566B; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF68D8FC1A; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so405731fxm.13 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=eREGmHj5GxqHfTQmXjbB+p294bk8eBZ+Z6b6RgKtyb0=; b=lnsUtXt7el4UzFzroXF/f19b4uR8LTijamtotPChZlHytJEDoPrHHWbpDlvA2WVOOT xwoJFDj5WfDKrNSGXxIuPLsw2iHjCt6hedMhDi4SEE/JzGFQm49w+EGGUJJOmzpZwdTi pxs7YDzjkSNUqbB3GMSy0WkIrmcACSPW6RSDg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=EtRmK2pUq8vSOuA/GlfZirtjyQ5N2yMAaAQa2bdEuyzkWdr9qz7xEs2z8US/FIFYi1 dC6Yvvu3Nf4LEP441OFXug8mag40OlE10Isual27vstsW93iMJjT3+9iil5QIE6x+OOf KbvRWJyv97xfSEfKZSL9UwvdkY5lqYzyAKyzs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.99.137 with SMTP id u9mr1313840fan.45.1286731537842; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.124.203 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:25:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1286730953.57597.73.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> References: <1286730953.57597.73.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:25:37 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Wayne Sierke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox QT issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:25:39 -0000 On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Wayne Sierke wrote: > > Just to be clear, in your case the board that died was the client > machine? Yes, that is correct. > How thorough was the effort in recompiling the hierarchy of the > hardware-dependent ports? > Quite thorough, a pkg_delete '*' and a complete rebuild. /usr/ports/UPDATING wouldn't apply because I compiled all new except for /usr/local/etc/ -- Adam Vande More