From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 17:08:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id BA9FA373; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:08:25 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Adam Weinberger Subject: Re: svn commit: r367002 - head/devel/cmake Message-ID: <20140902170825.GA50168@FreeBSD.org> References: <201409021339.s82DdX36038975@svn.freebsd.org> <5405E33B.3040906@marino.st> <5405E50B.1030100@marino.st> <30FDC48D-0DF1-4EBA-918D-878048101E21@adamw.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <30FDC48D-0DF1-4EBA-918D-878048101E21@adamw.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" , marino@freebsd.org, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" , Andrej Zverev , Raphael Kubo da Costa X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:08:25 -0000 On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:42:41AM -0400, Adam Weinberger wrote: > If it's on by default I don’t see the problem. Who are we to decide that > nobody should ever be allowed to build a port without manpages? Correct way out is to talk with upstream (yes, in every violating case) to provide pregen'ed manpages and/or documentaion in the release tarball (or separate file alongside). Lots of people still build things from ports, either because they like it this way, or they're not happy with our official binary packages (wrong OPTIONS selection for them). We should try to make their lives easier. I totally hate man/docs building. It has nothing do with my CPU; those bits most likely will be the same everywhere. Why not prebuild it then? ./danfe