Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 13:49:11 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 version in future ? Message-ID: <20160928134911.1a564ab9@moonstudio> In-Reply-To: <20160928133121.4751ffe7@moonstudio> References: <CANrxokEkYLY7uTv%2BnWy4K_iBeeaaCMraJmrNOD7cU2GXCWkNCA@mail.gmail.com> <0D6BF663-5C95-4625-B412-00E14EF97986@FreeBSD.org> <35.AF.06698.BEF4AE75@dnvrco-oedge03> <20160927134158.74c11036@archlinux.localdomain> <CAOgwaMuMfF7_zve%2BAMuJ8iiAD4wMXGUQDO4-j8Ck1B1FZ=NOXA@mail.gmail.com> <20160928091109.7aa95c9d@moonstudio> <CAOgwaMs_jRzvrnCxyD1i1z8S8Q4AzbpAGC0jGEp9Y-KwdqvbVA@mail.gmail.com> <20160928105420.7b1d117f@moonstudio> <20160928190022.5c06f809@X220.alogt.com> <20160928133121.4751ffe7@moonstudio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 13:31:21 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:00:22 +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: >>just take the last generation of plain 32-Bit-Atoms. They are really >>low power much less power hungry than e.g. an i7 of the same epoch. >>But it still is likely that the Atoms consume more energy to fulfil a >>specific task. > >This is a ridiculous comparison. > >>With other words, it is a complex problem with no clear answer. > >It's neither complex, nor is there an unclear answer. > >"The performance of a single-core Atom is about half that of a Pentium >M of the same clock rate. For example, the Atom N270 (1.60 GHz) found >in many netbooks such as the Eee PC can deliver around 3300 MIPS and >2.1 GFLOPS in standard benchmarks,[34] compared to 7400 MIPS and 3.9 >GFLOPS for the similarly clocked (1.73 GHz) Pentium M 740." - >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Atom#Performance > >http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/core/core-i7-processor.html >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core#Core_i7_3 Sorry, wrong link, same epoch is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core#Core_i7_2 what I mentioned still remains true ;). >"Core i7 Sandy-Bridge, 3,4 GHz, 4 Kerne 102,5 GFLOPS" - >https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_Point_Operations_Per_Second#Rechenleistung_von_Computersystemen >The German "102,5 GFLOPS" are English "102.5 GFLOPS" > >If you compare 32 bit Atoms, then better compare them with 64 bit Atoms >and not with completely unrelated CPUs, that are way beyond the Atom's >processing power. > >Regards, >Ralf
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160928134911.1a564ab9>