From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 18:41:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE8137B401 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 18:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webserver.get-linux.org (adsl-64-161-78-226.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.161.78.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DCBE43F85 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 18:41:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oremanj@webserver.get-linux.org) Received: (qmail 22767 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Jul 2003 01:41:23 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 18:41:23 -0700 From: Joshua Oreman To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20030728014123.GA22757@webserver> References: <20030727221936.6013.qmail@web10002.mail.yahoo.com> <20030727234719.GA81082@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030728012538.GA22618@webserver> <20030728013011.GA24057@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030728013011.GA24057@rot13.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: whats COMPAT_LINUX for? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 01:41:01 -0000 On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 06:30:12PM -0700 or thereabouts, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 06:25:38PM -0700, Joshua Oreman wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 04:47:19PM -0700 or thereabouts, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 03:19:36PM -0700, marlon corleone wrote: > > > > whats COMPAT_LINUX for in NOTES, cant find man pages > > > > about this. and also is it ok if to remove from kernel > > > > config this two lines: > > > > > > (freebsd-isp removed since this is off-topic for there). > > > > > > It compiles in Linux binary compatibility, also available as the > > > linux.ko kernel module. > > > > > > > device scbus # SCSI bus (required) > > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > device da > > > > > > > > since i have ni scsi device > > > > > > Yes (you'll have to remove any other devices that depend on SCSI > > > support, e.g. umass). > > > > Eh? `da' can be removed, but I seem to remember some kernel compile > > failures from no `scbus'. > > Only if you have other devices that depend on SCSI support, e.g. umass. Then why does it say (required) in the comment? IIRC: * most umass failures are caused by lack of `da' * some kcompile failures (no SCSI devs) are caused by lack of `scbus' -- Josh > > Kris