Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 10:39:34 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com Subject: Re: libc_r broken in 2.2 Message-ID: <199612170939.KAA15004@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199612162346.QAA05267@rocky.mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Dec 16, 96 04:46:21 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Nate Williams wrote: > This also requires backing out the 1.6 revision of include/time.h as > well. This change looked ``too much like a bug fix'' to me, that's why i've pulled it, along with the function change itself. Ok, you prove me wrong, i'll back it out. Thanks for pointing it out. Curious, why used libc_r to have differing return types for them? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612170939.KAA15004>