Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:51:43 -0800 From: Justin Meyer <zhengyi@anarkismus.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I have 2 copies of OpenSSL? Message-ID: <20051119005143.GB53252@oracle.local.lan> In-Reply-To: <437D6971.50309@russellmeek.net> References: <20051118005404.GA53252@oracle.local.lan> <437D6971.50309@russellmeek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Russell! On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Russell E. Meek wrote: > Justin Meyer wrote: > > >What gives? Is the way things should be? Or did I foul something up > >somewhere along the way through my upgrades? If I did mess something up, > >what should I do to fix it? > > > Justin, > > How about trying this, you have the most recent version of openssl > installed in base due to the upgrade to 6.0 - release. > > If you have the OpenSSL port installed why don't you uninstall the port > and place the following in your /etc/make.conf file > > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes > > This will force all ports you install going foward to use the base > install of OpenSSL and not to install OpenSSL as a dependency from ports. > > You could then make deinstall, make install clean && make distclean any > port that requires OpenSSL, Ruby for instance. > > This should make it build with the base install, eliminating the version > conflict. That seems to have done the trick, Russell; the script works again! Thank you very much for the suggestions :) -- Justin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051119005143.GB53252>