Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:33:39 +1100
From:      Nick Withers <nick@nickwithers.com>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NICs locking up, "*tcp_sc_h"
Message-ID:  <1237379619.85532.55.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903181151240.99720@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <1236920519.1490.30.camel@localhost> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903130935290.61873@fledge.watson.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903130949210.61873@fledge.watson.org> <1237020646.1532.24.camel@localhost> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903141756100.27597@fledge.watson.org> <1237081381.1581.2.camel@localhost> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903181151240.99720@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-SiMUy3jaWYaZiOHMhr+1
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:52 +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Nick Withers wrote:
>=20
> >> I'll need to think a bit about a proper fix for this, but you'll find =
the=20
> >> problem likely goes away if you eliminate all uid/gid/jail rules from =
your=20
> >> firewall.  You could also tweak the syncache logic not to use a retran=
smit=20
> >> timer, which might slightly extend the time it takes for systems to co=
nnect=20
> >> to your host in the presence of packet loss, but would eliminate this=20
> >> transmission path entirely.  We'll need a real and more general fix,=20
> >> however, to commit, and I'll look and see what I can come up with.
> >
> > Brilliant, thanks very much. I'll work without uid rules for the time b=
eing,=20
> > then.
>=20
> Could I ask you to file a PR on this problem, btw, with the two traces I=20
> singled out as interesting included, then forward me the PR receipt?  Tha=
t=20
> will make the problem easier to keep track of.

Done - Please see newborn kern/132774!

> We're currently pondering ways to fix the problem that don't disturb the=20
> stability of the ABI, and may have a workaround patch available shortly t=
hat's=20
> appropriate for MFC.

Wow! Must admit I'd assumed this one was going to take a while to sort
out, so I'm certainly happy to hear this.

Cheers very much!

> Robert N M Watson
> Computer Laboratory
> University of Cambridge
--=20
Nick Withers
email: nick@nickwithers.com
Web: http://www.nickwithers.com
Mobile: +61 414 397 446

--=-SiMUy3jaWYaZiOHMhr+1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAknA6iMACgkQ3wcG/Pf4Wrix4gCeOPV/SlO7eHjrTidvmtL8TIPl
m1IAn0UfQN/RAgQMnxqESgLAGDZIYlR/
=NnAG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-SiMUy3jaWYaZiOHMhr+1--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1237379619.85532.55.camel>