Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 15:05:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: no SYSVSHM in GENERIC now.. Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970715150416.8285A-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970715142504.15399C-100000@Journey2.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Chuck Robey wrote: > I think that's great, but it was the XFree86 folks who did that, not the > FreeBSD porter. If FreeBSD porters had to patch the software to eliminate > bugs, there'd be nearly no ports. Such things should be forwarded to the > software authors. It was written for a SysV system that includes SYSVSHM. It was ported to a BSD system that does not (normally) include SYSVSHM. At what point in the process did it break? -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.970715150416.8285A-100000>