From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 12 16:35:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8B1D416A4CE; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:35:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-15.dynamic.qsc.de
	[212.202.50.15])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1865243D3F; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:35:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com)
Received: from dhcp-13.local ([172.16.0.13] helo=dhcp-10.local)
	by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD))
	id 1BvIYT-0008tS-WE; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:35:56 +0200
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:37:31 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
To: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>
From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040812160617.GK32036@sirius.firepipe.net>
Message-Id: <E83FF538-EC7D-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9
cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
cc: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/dns Makefile ports/dns/bind93 Makefile
	distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:35:57 -0000

Will Andrews wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:05:24PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Second, there is quite frankly no significant history _of the BIND 9
>> port_ to preserve. If you had bothered to check the CVS history instead
>> of simply offering a knee-jerk reaction then you would have already
>> known this. Alternatively, if you did check the history, and there is
>> something there that you think needs to be preserved at all costs,
>> please state your case so that we can discuss it.
>
> What you've done is irreversible (thanks to cvsup), so there's no
> point in discussing this further.

FWIIW, we could repocopy bind9 to bind92 and upgrade the bind9 port to 
9.3 when the 9.3 branch is stable.

-Oliver