Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:58:50 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> Subject: Re: weak implementation of threads has problems - kse fix attached Message-ID: <20040608195850.GB46338@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <1086717435.68846.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <1086663455.1258.79.camel@server.mcneil.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406080028070.11500-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20040608044844.GA89198@dan.emsphone.com> <20040608072706.GA82243@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040608154510.GB89198@dan.emsphone.com> <1086717435.68846.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jun 08), Joe Marcus Clarke said: > If we switched PTHREAD_LIBS to -pthread, we wouldn't need this. Shared > objects would not have a link to libpthread, and shared objects that > really referenced pthread symbols would still require executables to be > linked to PTHREAD_LIBS (i.e. how it works on 4.X). It'd still be a good sanity check for people porting libraries, I think. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040608195850.GB46338>