From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 15:44:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5463B16A4CE for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:44:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72A143D5A for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:43:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7KFfvC7043291; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:41:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i7KFfvin043288; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:41:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:41:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Ceri Davies In-Reply-To: <20040820123854.GJ5433@submonkey.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why 6.0-current? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:44:00 -0000 On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:57:10PM +0400, Toxa wrote: > > Recent buildkernel brigns me new os version: > > > > FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Aug 19 22:28:50 MSD 2004 > > > > I'm wondering, why HEAD tag is not 5.3-CURRENT? According to > > development model, when 5.3-RELEASE will appear, HEAD should becomes 5.4-CURRENT, after 5.4-RELEASE it should bbecomes 5.5-CURRENT, etc... > > Why 6.0? New development model? Would u mind to drop a link > > describing this. > > With 5.3-RELEASE, RELENG_5 becomes -STABLE, and therefore 5.4-CURRENT > will never exist; it will be 5.4-STABLE. HEAD is now 6.0-CURRENT. This > has been the plan for quite some time. Just to make specific an implication of the above to make sure it's clear to all readers: RELENG_5 is not currently -STABLE. It will be, but is not yet. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research