From owner-freebsd-commit  Fri Nov 17 07:34:18 1995
Return-Path: owner-commit
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA09472
          for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:34:18 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA09456
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:34:14 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA09442
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:34:09 -0800
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA09412
          ; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:33:55 -0800
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0tGSnZ-0003vmC; Fri, 17 Nov 95 07:33 PST
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA00251; Fri, 17 Nov 1995 16:33:50 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: davidg@Root.COM
cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_de.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Nov 1995 07:24:30 PST."
             <199511171524.HAA00371@corbin.Root.COM> 
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 16:33:49 +0100
Message-ID: <249.816622429@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> >> P.S. Changes like this post-2.1 really make a strong argument for a
> >> unified patch mechanism.  Can we start talking about this again
> >> now, please?
> >> 
> >I'm all for using CTM.
> 
>    CTM isn't for everyone. I really would prefer an FTP based patch mechanism