Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:35:36 +0100 From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pawe=C5=82_Ma=C5=82achowski?= <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: proposal: TCP rendevous Message-ID: <4B01DC26-9610-41DC-9386-C172DD55640C@lassitu.de> In-Reply-To: <20051127101824.GA3606@lagoon.freebsd.lublin.pl> References: <43894FC9.6040205@elischer.org> <20051127101824.GA3606@lagoon.freebsd.lublin.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 27.11.2005 um 11:18 schrieb Pawe=C5=82 Ma=C5=82achowski: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:18:49PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> I'm still thinking about connecting systems separated by NAT however. >> that's a trickier problem. you still need to use outgoing =20 >> connections but >> no-one who is not in the path can not tell what the NAT'd packets =20 >> looke >> like. > > BTW, I've heared Windows-behind-NAT-people ;) are using http://=20 > hamachi.cc > trick, however, I've never tried. 5/8 is reserved--for now. The software is binary-only. For a better alternative, check out OpenVPN. Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Fon +49 170 346 0140
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B01DC26-9610-41DC-9386-C172DD55640C>