Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:42:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> Cc: Henrik Holmstam <turbo@lamering.org>, Alfatrion <alfatrion@cybertron.tmfweb.nl>, "Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey)" <brentb@loa.com>, "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW or IPFILTER? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0110121642070.19241-100000@rac4.wam.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <3BC72707.55CF33A7@tenebras.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I suppose another big reason that I started using ipfilter is it's performance... for me and for what we do through our FreeBSD router (with gaming through the nat) ipfw + natd just wasn't cutting it. Ken On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > > > I don't know, I couldn't get it to do that, which is one of the main > > reasons I switched to ipfilter :-D > > 01200 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ed0 > 01300 check-state > > ... > > 02000 allow udp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep-state > > Easy as pi. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.21.0110121642070.19241-100000>