Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:38:05 +0200 (MET DST) From: Nick Hibma <nick.hibma@jrc.it> To: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: Alexander Maret <maret@axis.de>, "'hackers@freebsd.org'" <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: xl driver for 3Com Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.990602092903.14790R-100000@elect8> In-Reply-To: <199906012257.SAA25604@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If it "had no backing" then how could it be a "fact"? I assume that if you report that a card fails to work that that is true. That makes it a fact, e.g. my seat is red, but I'm not going to send you a picture to prove it. > replacing the cards with intels and having the problem go away is backing. > It may not be *useful*, but it is backing. Backing of the fact that there is a problem that you need to solve in a limited amount of money, yes. No backing of the fact that the problem is caused by the xl driver, e.g. if a card is not well seated you solve the problem as well by replacing the card. Nick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95q.990602092903.14790R-100000>