Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:40:14 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: hackers@freebsd.org Cc: ambrisko@ambrisko.com Subject: Re: bge problems (was: gigabit NIC of choice?) Message-ID: <200209111740.g8BHeE1o032079@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <200209111719.g8BHJfQ03083@ambrisko.com> References: <200209111719.g8BHJfQ03083@ambrisko.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <200209111719.g8BHJfQ03083@ambrisko.com>, Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> wrote: > John Polstra writes: > | If you want a gigabit interface that is likely to keep working in > | FreeBSD, your only option is to use the Intel chips and the "em" > | driver. It's our only gigabit driver that's maintained by somebody > | who has unrestricted access to the documentation and errata. > > Atleast one potential exception to this it that so far National seems > to keep their programming on line without needed an NDA. Whoops, thanks for the correction. That's good news. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209111740.g8BHeE1o032079>