Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:01:31 +0100 From: Tilman Linneweh <tilman@arved.de> To: Max Okumoto <okumoto@ucsd.edu> Cc: libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are are you devel on? Message-ID: <20021220100131.GA23780@huckfinn.arved.de> In-Reply-To: <hffzst1sh4.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu> References: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <hffzst1sh4.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In arved.freebsd.libh, you wrote: >> Because of this incompatibility, the kde-freebsd people would like >> to push people to port their apps to qt3, so that qt2* can be removed, >> as soon no major app depends on it.=20 >=20 > The problem is that the libh binary need to be staticly linked. So > we need them to create the static libraries. If someone submits a slave port like the qt23-static. I'll look at it. libh seems to be the only port, that needs a static library. But if you are seriously planning to move to qt3, a static version should be added. = =20 =20 >> >=20 >> > tvision-0.8 does not compile with gcc32. >> > (Note; I have a patch for this... but I have not done >> > extensive tests with it yet.) >>=20 >> If you have patches, please submit them, since the port is currently >> marked broken on 5.0 >=20 > Its has not been tested... and depending on the answer to the later > questions I may clean it up or drop it. Does anyone else want/need > tvision? libh seems to be the only port that uses tvision. If your patches are fixing the build on 5.0 and are not breaking the port= =20 on STABLE, go ahead and make them public :).=20 >=20 >> > Are we planning on going to qt30 and how are we going to handle the >> > share vs static linking issue? >> >=20 >> > Do we want our own copy of tvision until I can find who maintains the >> > ports version. Or are we planing on moving to rhtvision? Do we >> > want to GPL libh? >>=20 >> The tvision port is currently unmaintained, perhaps maintainer should >> be passed to libh@freebsd.org? >=20 > Who would we talk to about this? Do we want to do this? :-) I was just asking, since you are the only people that use the port, you pro= bably want to review patches to the port. > The original code is copyrighted by Borland but is freely available from > the net. Try here. This port is distributed under the GPL license and > the Sigala's port under a BSD like license. [stuff deleted] >=20 > Which is why I am asking. Sorry, didn't know that. I'll hide under my stone again. But i would prefer using tvision because of the license. regards arved --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Aup6fCLDn4B6xToRAlfeAJ49Sk+OWuKyWUc21WTjx+HQ01iGewCePw42 RkhlkPx86SIemzWtAlAkTQo= =UYei -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021220100131.GA23780>