Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:44:34 +0100
From:      Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
To:        Matthias Muthmann <mmuthmann@gmx.net>
Cc:        freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Problems with X..
Message-ID:  <200503041644.34459.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
In-Reply-To: <1109950493.21431.5.camel@localhost>
References:  <200502240244.03104.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200503022010.39072.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <1109950493.21431.5.camel@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 04 of March 2005 16:34, Matthias Muthmann wrote:
> On Mi, 2005-03-02 at 20:10 +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> > Just the ones that don't work (if they are consecutive in the row, only a
> > range would be fine). I'm also interested in whether without these
> > patches applied - was the row in question behaving the same as the other
> > keys (ie codes generated being off by one) or was it behaving differently
> > even then?
> >
> >
> > Dejan
>
> Ok, now I tried X without your patches. The lowest row behaves in the
> same way as with your patches:
> e.g. keycode 198 (keysym 0x0, NoSymbol)
> But the keycodes are shifted by one (Y is 191, not 190 ...)

Thank you! I'll try digging into this over weekend and hopefully find 
something that can be done to map codes properly :)


Dejan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503041644.34459.dejan.lesjak>