From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 10 09:12:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA24934 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 09:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov (gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov [137.75.131.181]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA24929 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 09:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emu.fsl.noaa.gov (kelly@emu.fsl.noaa.gov [137.75.60.32]) by gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA22507; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 16:12:08 GMT Message-Id: <199609101612.QAA22507@gatekeeper.fsl.noaa.gov> Received: by emu.fsl.noaa.gov (1.40.112.4/16.2) id AA233361930; Tue, 10 Sep 1996 10:12:10 -0600 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 10:12:10 -0600 From: Sean Kelly To: hmmm@alaska.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <323314A6.3372@alaska.net> (message from hmmm on Sun, 08 Sep 1996 11:47:02 -0700) Subject: Re: internal modem Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Is it possible you could just set those modems to com3/irq5 and avoid the strange dos+FreeBSD behavior altogether? -- Sean Kelly NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory kelly@fsl.noaa.gov Boulder Colorado USA http://www-sdd.fsl.noaa.gov/~kelly/