From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 24 02:25:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE46E1065679 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshua_rickmar@eumx.net) Received: from eumx.net (eumx.net [85.114.129.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCE68FC08 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joshua_rickmar@eumx.net) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37080 helo=ssl.eumx.net) by eumx.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KtCN5-0005fy-JS; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:25:52 +0000 Received: from 67.177.142.45 (SquirrelMail authenticated user joshua_rickmar) by ssl.eumx.net with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:25:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <61973.67.177.142.45.1224815151.squirrel@ssl.eumx.net> In-Reply-To: <49012D63.8020201@math.missouri.edu> References: <53980.67.177.142.45.1224810884.squirrel@ssl.eumx.net> <49012D63.8020201@math.missouri.edu> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:25:51 -0400 (EDT) From: "Josh Rickmar" To: "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Concern about using pkg_delete -r X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:25:55 -0000 On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:05 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Josh Rickmar wrote: > >> I'm hoping that this list covers port tools as well as the usual >> discussions about the actual ports. If not, please CC this to the >> proper list. >> >> I want to use pkg_delete to remove an installed port, but also want to >> remove its orphaned dependencies along with it. After looking at the >> pkg_delete(1) man page, the -r flag seems to be the option to use for >> this job. My concern, though, is about the wording: >> >>> In addition to specified packages, delete all >>> packages that depend on those packages as well. >> >> Does this mean that if I pkg_delete -r pkgA, than pkgB (a dependency) >> will be removed with it, even though it is dependency of pkgC? Or is >> pkg_delete (or pkg_deinstall) smart enough to understand this >> dependency and keep pkgB installed? >> >> If in this scenario pkgB would be deleted, should an extra warning be >> added to the man page so that users know that using this flag could >> potentially break their other ports? > > I think you have the dependency relationship the wrong way around. > > > If you do "pkg_delete -r pkgA", and pkgA is a dependency of pkgB (not > the other way around as you have it), then pkgB will be deleted. > Ah, my bad. Yeah, after re-reading the wording it seems that is the case. What about for pkg_deinstall (part of portupgrade)? According to its man page, it has two options, --recursive (-r) and --upward-recursive (-R). Maybe it's just a little bit late, but what /exactly/ is the difference? It sounds like the --upward-recursive option would be better called --downward-recursive, since it will remove the ports/packages "below" it. So, if that is the case, would pkg_deinstall -R pkgA remove pkgB or not? -- To send me a personal email, please place [personal] in the Subject line.