From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Oct 26 6:42:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F1C37B405; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 06:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id GAA18283; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 06:42:27 -0700 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda18281; Fri Oct 26 06:42:21 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.6/8.9.1) id f9QDgJ323755; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 06:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from UNKNOWN(10.1.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdH23753; Fri Oct 26 06:41:54 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id f9QDfSS64291; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 06:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200110261341.f9QDfSS64291@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdL64276; Fri Oct 26 06:40:50 2001 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-Sender: schubert To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Mike Barcroft , Bill Fenner , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: import bawk? Re: NO_AWK In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2001 22:12:15 PDT." <200110260512.f9Q5CFS40443@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 06:40:50 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200110260512.f9Q5CFS40443@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com>, "Bruce A . Mah" writes: > If memory serves me right, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > Bill Fenner writes: > > > >bawk is license friendly for us. > > > > > > "without fee" is license friendly for us? > > > > The way I read it, the "without fee" applies to the "permission", not > > the "any purpose." That is, they grant you permission to use it for > > any purpose and don't charge you a fee. They don't require your uses > > of it be not-for-profit. > > > > It looks like a reworded 3-clause BSD license to me. :) > > Rather than us guessing at the meaning (which I feel *is* rather > ambiguous), would it make sense for someone to request clarification > from some suitable representative of Lucent, telling them exactly what > the plans are and asking if they're compatible with the license? The > Web page has a pointer to Brian Kernighan...I'm pretty sure he'd know > the answer. :-) This is an excellent idea. I recently resolved an MIT Kerberos encryption export issue just by asking. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD Ministry of Management Services Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message