Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 11:48:18 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>, FreeBSD-CURRENT Mailing List <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Message-ID: <20000503114818.B42554@myhakas.matti.ee> In-Reply-To: <v04210103b53525f556d6@[128.113.24.47]>; from drosih@rpi.edu on Tue, May 02, 2000 at 08:52:11PM -0400 References: <v0422080ab53464df3042@[195.238.1.121]> <v04210103b53525f556d6@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 08:52:11PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> wrote: > If this is an issue for some nntp software, perhaps that port (the > freebsd 'port collection' port...) should build and use the newer > version of db? Would that help whatever issue got you interested > in this? The upcoming INN-2.3.0 port will need newer Berkeley DB for overview database, in case you specifically request support for it. The 3.0.55 version of Berkeley DB compiles out of the box on the -current as I tried it few days ago. But I think the port of 2.7.7 we have already is enough, althought haven't tried it myself. -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000503114818.B42554>