From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Apr 9 06:20:57 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC09CD35DA8 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 06:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB80066D for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 06:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v396KvIA060843 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 06:20:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218384] multimedia/handbrake (0.10.5_5): Doesn't upgrading to 1.0.3 Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2017 06:20:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rkoberman@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2017 06:20:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218384 --- Comment #19 from rkoberman@gmail.com --- Here is what I get when attempting to appy the patch: Patching file patch-contrib_libbluray_A02-expose-clip__id.patch using Plan = A... Hunk #1 failed at 4. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to patch-contrib_libbluray_A02-expose-clip__id.patch.rej done So no joy at all. I understand the problem. Seems like there needs to be a standard format for patch files. Diffs can come in any format, but one needs to get the One True patch format. This one is really, really a pain to deal with. I am somewhat familiar with the way that this gets built from my sad attempts to build a = port for this. I'll happily keep testing as much as I can and provide whatever help I can,= but it's beyond my capabilities, I fear, to contribute much more. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=