Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 08:51:54 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, FreeBSD current users <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Do we still need portmap(8)? Message-ID: <91426.1033973514@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2002 16:19:08 %2B0930." <20021007064908.GH14070@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20021007064908.GH14070@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: >On Sunday, 6 October 2002 at 23:42:55 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:02:51PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >>> It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems. Is >>> it still needed, or can it be removed completely? At the very least, >>> the man page should stop claiming that it's necessary to run NFS. >> >> Are you saying we've left behind an old manpage? > >No, I'm asking whether we have left behind both an old man page and an >old binary. > >On closer examination, though, it looks like this is the result of >installing a 4.7 system and immediately upgrading it to 5-CURRENT, so >that the dates of the files looked pretty much the same. Sorry for >that confusion. What's the recommended way of getting old binaries >off the system? I use: cd /usr/src make installworld DESTDIR=/some/where diff -ur /some/where / manual review. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91426.1033973514>