Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:13:29 +0930
From:      Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mike Maltese <mike@pcmedx.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vinum and hot-swapping
Message-ID:  <20030712074329.GO24420@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <001b01c34835$6cc93ca0$f9f0a8c0@pcmedx.com>
References:  <000e01c34830$6e543bb0$f9f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> <20030712045247.GL24420@wantadilla.lemis.com> <001b01c34835$6cc93ca0$f9f0a8c0@pcmedx.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--McmgqJn15zuLm7T+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday, 11 July 2003 at 22:21:19 -0700, Mike Maltese wrote:
>> Depends on what you mean.  Vinum isn't a hardware device driver, so it
>> doesn't need to understand hot swapping.  If you hot swap a drive,
>> Vinum handles the resulting events correctly.
>
> So if I have a drive fail, say in a RAID 5 configuration, I don't have to
> detach it at all? Just swap them out and vinum will automatically begin
> rebuilding the array?

Well, not quite.  See
http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/replacing-drive.html for the real story.

> Also, what would you say the minimum processor requirement would be?
> I know RAID 5 is quite taxing compared to mirroring or plain
> striping.

I developed Vinum on a 66 MHz i486.  I didn't notice any significant
processor load.  Remember that modern CPUs are an order of magnitude
faster than most RAID controllers.

The real performance penalty for RAID-5 is simply that writes require
so much I/O.  Expect 25% of the write performance of RAID-0.

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

--McmgqJn15zuLm7T+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/D7whIubykFB6QiMRAmd7AKCGExPNxUeyfl+cUQ45s5MvzOHmewCgoheB
SLRcQ9Pj1tk0qDYu5IP7w1A=
=N4Up
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--McmgqJn15zuLm7T+--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030712074329.GO24420>