From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 4 19:34:07 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA29837 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 19:34:07 -0700 Received: from tfs.com (mailhub.tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA29830; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 19:34:02 -0700 Received: by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) Message-Id: From: julian@TFS.COM (Julian Elischer) Subject: Re: SATAN ported?? To: bmk@dtr.com Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 19:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Cc: julian@TFS.COM, rkw@dataplex.net, smmcgee@ncbc.edu, questions@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199504050223.TAA21370@dtr.com> from "bmk@dtr.com" at Apr 4, 95 07:23:25 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 2006 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Well as I said we could use ref, as the sysads here are about to want to do that anyhow, and it's 'my' machine and it's 'OUTSIDE' our firewall, it'd probably be a good choice.. it has a T1 almost to itself, particularly after today when sysad turn off all our internet access in response to SATAN being released.. (they are turning up all the dials on the routers so that effectively only mail and news will get in and even then only to 1 machine) when they've had time to play with SATAN they hope to relax it a bit more.. if we get it ported,and it can run on a 1.1.5.1 machine I offer ref up and we can try set up guest accounts to known people to try it against their own systems. > > I'm going to have a go at porting perl5 tonight - I'll let everyone know > how it goes. > > One thing bothers me. I can run SATAN locally to test my own network, > but I have no capability to run it remotely. The only other network > that I have sufficient access to is not very well connected (all access > to the Internet is via a 9600bps SLIP link on a proxy gateway - the > gateway doesn't have the resources to run it, and it'd be painfully slow > besides). I don't know how effective this tool will be running "on the > inside". The only other options I have for running it personally are on > systems with sysadmins that I do not fully trust. > > I'd like to enlist the help of someone to probe my site - but for > obvious reasons, it must be someone trustworthy. > > What's a sysadmin to do? :) > > > we need to do that here too.... > > > let me know if your get it done.. > > I can set it up on REF.tfs.com and we can use it as a service to beat on each > > other's systems :) > > > > > > > "Sean McGee" writes: > > > >So, who's going to port SATAN so that we have some kind of defense? > > > > > > Who has ported perl5? We must have that as a tool to make SATAN work. > > > > > > ---- > > > Richard Wackerbarth > > > rkw@dataplex.net > > > > > > > > > > >