From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 19 16:32:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155D01065674 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs) Received: from smtp9.sbb.rs (smtp9.sbb.rs [89.216.2.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F4E8FC08 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mycenae (cable-178-148-99-97.dynamic.sbb.rs [178.148.99.97]) by smtp9.sbb.rs (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id q6JG67s2024446 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:06:12 +0200 Received: by mycenae (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1074B5C23; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:08:31 +0200 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120719160831.GA1086@mycenae.sbb.rs> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-SMTP-Vilter-Version: 1.3.2 X-SBB-Virus-Status: clean X-SBB-Spam-Score: -0.8 Subject: branch 9 and uefi X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:32:28 -0000 It took me by surprise. The mobo I have on my mind for new desktop has uefi instead of bios. It is asus m5a97, with 970 chipset, well priced among users on the net. How would it behave with 9.1? After all reading, I plan to boot it as memory stick and go with simple "guided" install. Someone could comment on the topic? At the moment, I see I have to avoid manual partition and mbr. Or not? If it sounds bad, any other option for motherboard and amd 8120 cpu? Best regards Zoran