From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Dec 28 16:18:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBCC14D67
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 16:18:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: (from eischen@localhost)
	by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id TAA22761;
	Tue, 28 Dec 1999 19:18:10 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 19:18:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
Message-Id: <199912290018.TAA22761@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: eischen@vigrid.com, jasone@canonware.com
Subject: Re: the nist port
Cc: culverk@wam.umd.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, sos@freebsd.dk
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> They're in sys/unistd.h, which is included by unistd.h.  That should be
> just fine, and that location appears to be consistent with our other POSIX
> macro definitions.

Ahh, good.  I didn't have them because I wasn't up to date.

So the question is now, why wasn't the nist port picking them up?

Dan Eischen
eischen@vigrid.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message