Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:53:50 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ./options-descr file suggestion for ports Message-ID: <467004FE.60109@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <A2E1DABC-0F0E-475C-B282-0CC07C4278B5@khera.org> References: <200706090936.51775.david@vizion2000.net> <20070609203316.GC71246@voodoo.bawue.com> <20070611151636.GA16517@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <822946050706120826r75835defj2dbf76fc2ecfccb6@mail.gmail.com> <20070613093658.dk1r5iud8gssss0o@webmail.leidinger.net> <A2E1DABC-0F0E-475C-B282-0CC07C4278B5@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> First there where no OPTIONS, then OPTIONS was introduced. If you feel >> annoyed by those ports which are not converted yet to OPTIONS (because >> nobody felt annoyed enough to convert them), feel free to submit >> patches for them. > > personally, I'm annoyed by ports that use OPTIONS because I cannot then > set them globally in my make.conf file (which is copied around to all my > servers). I have to ensure that the proper OPTIONS are set on every > machine on which I may build a port. > > Is it possible (and/or is anyone working on) a way to make the options > setting non-interactive and pull the settings from a config file instead? Look at the ports man page: BATCH=yes If not options files exist the options as set in /etc/make.conf will be used.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?467004FE.60109>