Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:32:51 -0700
From:      Bill Campbell <freebsd@celestial.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?
Message-ID:  <20031005003251.GA20735@alexis.mi.celestial.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031004164554.X3248@atlas.home>
References:  <3F7F29C5.7030606@relia.net> <20031004164554.X3248@atlas.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:
...
>Having had some experience writing pam modules on a number of
>platforms, I whipped out my suite of pam test modules to have a look
>at this incredbible breakage you speak of.  I mean, there is a
>specification for pam after all.

Could you suggest where to look for information on writing modules to
handle session tasks?  I've looked at the PAM stuff superficially over the
years, and would be very interested in doing something with the session
modules to do things like automatically creating missing home directories
with appropriate links to automounted directories.

I haven't done much with this on FreeBSD yet since I need pam_ldap and
nss_ldap support which only seems to be available in the 5.x tree.

Bill
--
INTERNET:  bill@Celestial.COM   Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP:              camco!bill   PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:           (206) 232-9186   Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
http://www.celestial.com/

You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a
reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating
the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for
independence.
        -- Charles A. Beard



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031005003251.GA20735>